ArticleAJOG global reports2024
Vaginal delivery in women with perianal Crohn's disease: why not?
Article in AJOG global reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPregnant women with active perianal Crohn's disease indicate a cesarean delivery according to the current European Crohn's and Colitis Organisation guidelines. This advice is based on the assumption that vaginal delivery leads to exacerbation of perianal disease and worsening of fecal continence. However, there is no strong evidence to support this.
objectiveThis study aims to examine the effects of the delivery method on perianal disease progression and fecal incontinence in women with perianal Crohn's disease. STUDY
designIn this retrospective cohort study, 102 women were selected from the 1000 inflammatory bowel disease cohort of a tertiary hospital in the Netherlands. All women are aged >18 years, have perianal Crohn's disease, and have given birth. In addition, all women completed a questionnaire. Fecal continence was scored using the Vaizey score. Using SPSS, descriptive analysis and linear regression analysis were performed, and
resultsThe cesarean delivery rate within our cohort was 19.5%. Within the group of women who delivered at least one child vaginally (n=84), 25.5% reported alteration of fecal continence, compared with 13.1% in women who only had cesarean delivery (n=18). After a mean follow-up of 15 years, the median Vaizey score within the cesarean delivery group was 5, compared with 7 in the vaginal delivery group. Within the vaginal delivery group, 18.8% reported perianal disease progression, compared with 22.2% in the cesarean delivery group. No significant relation between mode of delivery and fecal continence or perianal disease progression was found (B, 0,97 [-1,19 to 3,14],
conclusionFecal incontinence and perianal disease progression after vaginal delivery in Crohn's disease women with active perianal fistula is not significantly increased in this retrospective cohort. This study opens the discussion for more tailored obstetric advice in women with perianal Crohn's disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.