Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38655540›Full record

ReviewJournal of orthopaedics2024

Local vancomycin administration in Orthopaedic Surgery - A systematic review of comparative studies.

Darius L Lameire, Jack Soeder, Hassaan Abdel Khalik, Ellie Pinsker, Nipun Atri, Amir Khoshbin, Lenny Radomski, Amit Atrey

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of orthopaedics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.2field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Impact of Local Vancomycin on Postoperative Outcomes in Ankle Arthrodesis: A Propensity-Matched Cohort Study.Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. Global research & reviews · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Darius L LameireDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Jack SoederDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Hassaan Abdel KhalikDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Ellie PinskerSt. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Nipun AtriDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, Rush University Medical Centre, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Amir KhoshbinSt. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Lenny RadomskiDivision of Orthopaedic Surgery, St. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Amit AtreySt. Michael's Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
St. Michael's Hospital · CAMcMaster University · CARush University Medical Center · USUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: There is still controversy surrounding the routine use of vancomycin locally in primary orthopaedic surgery procedures. Therefore, the aim of this review is to assess how local vancomycin impacts the rates and microbiology of surgical site infections. Methods: A systematic electronic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Web of Science was carried out for all comparative studies comparing locally applied vancomycin to control for primary orthopaedic surgery procedures published before August 14, 2022. Results: A total of 61 studies with 65,671 patients were included for analysis. Forty-six studies used vancomycin powder, 12 studies with grafts soaked in vancomycin, two studies used vancomycin irrigation, and one study administered vancomycin interosseously. There were 15 studies (of 26) in spine surgery, five (of 14) in arthroplasty, ten (of 11) in sports medicine, and two (of five) in trauma surgery that found statistically significant decreases in overall infection rates when applying local vancomycin. Only one study (in spine surgery) found significant increases in infection rates with local vancomycin application. For spine surgery, local vancomycin application had the greatest proportion of gram-negative bacteria (40.7%) isolated compared to Conclusion: Applying local vancomycin during primary orthopaedic surgery procedures may reduce the rates of infections in multiple different orthopaedic specialties, particularly in spine surgery and sports medicine. However, careful consideration should be applied when administering local vancomycin during specific orthopaedic procedures given the heterogeneity of included studies and breadth of surgeries included in this review. Level of evidence: Level III. A systematic review of level I - III studies.

Indexed as

InfectionLocalOrthopaedicPowderTopicalVancomycin

Identifiers

PMID38655540
PMCPMC11035019
OpenAlexW4394689437

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.