Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38655533›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in veterinary science2024

A systematic review on the prospects of X- and Y-sexed semen in ruminant livestock: implications for conservation, a South African perspective.

Jabulani Nkululeko Ngcobo, Tshimangadzo Lucky Nedambale, Sindisiwe Mbali Sithole, Bohani Mtileni, Takalani Judas Mpofu, Fhulufhelo Vincent Ramukhithi, Tlou Caswel Chokoe, Khathutshelo Agree Nephawe

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Animal reproduction · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Jabulani Nkululeko NgcoboDepartment of Animal Sciences, Tshwane University of Technology, Pretoria, South Africa.
Tshimangadzo Lucky NedambaleDepartment of Animal Sciences, Tshwane University of Technology, Pretoria, South Africa.
Sindisiwe Mbali SitholeGermplasm, Conservation, Reproductive Biotechnologies, Agricultural Research Council, Pretoria, South Africa.
Bohani MtileniDepartment of Animal Sciences, Tshwane University of Technology, Pretoria, South Africa.
Takalani Judas MpofuDepartment of Animal Sciences, Tshwane University of Technology, Pretoria, South Africa.
Fhulufhelo Vincent RamukhithiGermplasm, Conservation, Reproductive Biotechnologies, Agricultural Research Council, Pretoria, South Africa.
Tlou Caswel ChokoeDepartment of Agriculture, Land Reform, and Rural Development, Directorate Farm Animal Genetic Resource, Pretoria, South Africa.
Khathutshelo Agree NephaweDepartment of Animal Sciences, Tshwane University of Technology, Pretoria, South Africa.
Tshwane University of Technology · ZAAgricultural Research Council of South Africa · ZADepartment of Agriculture, Land Reform and Rural Development · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

South Africa is home to numerous indigenous and locally developed sheep (Nguni Pedi, Zulu, and Namaqua Afrikaner, Afrino, Africander, Bezuidenhout Africander, Damara, Dorper, Döhne Merino, Meat Master, South African Merino, South African Mutton Merino, Van Rooy, and Dorper), goat (SA veld, Tankwa, Imbuzi, Bantu, Boer, and Savanna) and cattle (Afrigus, Afrikaner, Bolowana, Bonsmara, Bovelder, Drakensberger, South African Angus, South African Dairy Swiss, South African Friesland, South African Red, and Veld Master) animals. These breeds require less veterinary service, feed, management efforts, provide income to rural and or poor owners. However, most of them are under extinction risks and some with unknown status hence, require immediate conservation intervention. To allow faster genetic progress on the endangered animals, it is important to generate productive animals while reducing wastages and this can be achieved through sex-sorted semen. Therefore, this systematic review is aimed to evaluate the prospects of X and Y-sexed semen in ruminant livestock and some solutions that can be used to address poor sex-sorted semen and its fertility. This review was incorporated through gathering and assessing relevant articles and through the data from the DAD-IS database. The keywords that were used to search articles online were pre-gender selection, indigenous ecotypes, fertility, flow cytometry, artificial insemination, conservation, and improving sexed semen. Following a careful review of all articles, PRISMA guidelines were used to find the articles that are suitable to address the aim of this review. Sex-sorted semen is a recently introduced technology gaining more attention from researchers particularly, in the conservation programs. Preselection of semen based on the sex chromosomes (X- and or Y-bearing chromosomes) is of paramount importance to obtain desired sex of the offspring and avoid animal wastage as much as possible. However, diverse factors can affect quality of semen of different animal species especially after sex-sorting. Flow cytometry is a common method used to select male and female sperm cells and discard dead and abnormal sperm cells during the process. Thus, sperm sexing is a good advanced reproductive technology (ART) however, it is associated with the production of oxidative stress (OS) and DNA fragmentation (SDF). These findings, therefore, necessitates more innovation studies to come up with a sexing technology that will protect sperm cell injuries during sorting in frozen-thawed.

Indexed as

artificial inseminationconservationfertilityflow cytometryimproving sexed semenindigenous ecotypespre-gender selection

Identifiers

PMID38655533
PMCPMC11037082
OpenAlexW4394605531

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.