ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2024
Five-year outcomes of double kissing mini-culotte stenting vs. mini-culotte stenting using drug-eluting stents for the treatment of true coronary bifurcation lesions.
Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical value of Lipoprotein(a) combined with CatLet coronary score in predicting adverse events after emergency PCI for AMI patients.PloS one · 2026Article
- Ultimaster TANSEI Stent in Complex Coronary Lesions: The EPIC08 TANSEI COMPLEX Study.Interventional cardiology (London, England) · 2026Article
- Challenges and Optimization of Percutaneous Coronary Interventions for Coronary Bifurcation Lesions.Reviews in cardiovascular medicine · 2026Review
- Clinical outcomes of double kissing crush or double kissing culotte technique in left main bifurcation lesions: the MAIN-ROUTE registry.Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology · 2025Article
- Adherence to Guideline Recommendations and Clinical Outcomes of Different Stenting Techniques in Non-Left Main Bifurcation Lesions.Anatolian journal of cardiology · 2025Observational
- Sex Differences in Clinical Features and Outcomes in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome Treated with Bifurcation Stenting Using the Double-Kissing Culotte and Culotte Technique - 1-year Follow-up.Vascular health and risk management · 2025Article
- Comparative Short-Term Outcomes of Double-Kissing Culotte and Culotte Techniques in Acute Coronary Syndrome from the Lower Silesia Culotte Bifurcation Registry.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Evaluation of Small Vessel Bifurcation Stenting Using the Double-Kissing Culotte and Culotte Technique in Acute Coronary Syndrome: 12-Month Clinical Outcomes.Clinical cardiology · 2024Article
- The Role of Intravascular Ultrasound in the Evaluation and Treatment of Free-Floating Stent Struts Following Inadequate Ostial Circumflex Stenting: A Case Report.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of double kissing mini-culotte (DKMC) stenting with those of mini-culotte (MC) stenting in treating patients with true coronary bifurcation lesions (CBLs) in the clinical real world. Methods: This retrospective observational cohort study included 180 consecutive patients with true CBLs (Medina type 1,1,1; 1,0,1; 0,1,1). All eligible patients underwent coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention with two-stent techniques in our hospital; among them, 97 received DKMC treatment and 83 MC treatment. The primary clinical endpoints were the major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), which included cardiac death, myocardial infarction, and target vessel/lesion revascularization (TVR/TLR). The secondary endpoints were stent thrombosis, in-stent restenosis, and individual components of MACE. Results: Quantitative coronary angiography analysis (at 5 years) revealed that late lumen loss (0.25 ± 0.41 mm vs. 0.14 ± 0.32 mm, Conclusion: DKMC treatment was associated with less late lumen loss and restenosis in the side branch and a lower rate of cumulative MACE and TVR/TLR. DKMC treatment is more effective for treating true CBLs than MC treatment; however, these findings warrant further confirmation through a randomized clinical trial.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.