Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38655438›Full record

ArticleBrain circulation

Impacts of futile reperfusion and reperfusion injury in acute ischemic stroke.

Ahmed Elmadhoun, Hongrui Wang, Yuchuan Ding

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain circulation. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 29 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
29citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

29 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ahmed ElmadhounDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Wayne State University, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Hongrui WangInstitute of Neuroscience, Beijing Luhe Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Yuchuan DingDepartment of Neurosurgery, Wayne State University School of Medicine, Detroit, Michigan, USA.
Wayne State University · USBeijing Luhe Hospital Affiliated to Capital Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Acute ischemic stroke (AIS) remains to be a challenging cerebrovascular disease. The mainstay of AIS management is endovascular reperfusion therapy, including thrombectomy and thrombolysis. However, ineffective (futile) reperfusion (FR) or reperfusion injury (RI) can be seen in a significant number of patients undergoing reperfusion strategy. In this article, we discuss two clinically relevant concepts known as "time window" and "tissue window" that can impact the clinical outcome of reperfusion therapy. We also explore patient risk factors, leading to FR and RI as well as an emerging concept of "no-reflow phenomenon" seen in ineffective reperfusion. These fundamental concepts provide insight into the clinical management of AIS patients and provide references for future research.

Indexed as

Endovascular reperfusion therapyineffective (futile) reperfusionno-reflow phenomenonthrombectomythrombolysistime windowtissue window

Identifiers

PMID38655438
PMCPMC11034445
OpenAlexW4393062149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.