ReviewCurrent research in structural biology2024
Back in time to the Gly-rich prototype of the phosphate binding elementary function.
Review in Current research in structural biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Compositionally Biased Regions Within Structured Protein Domains.Biomolecules · 2026Article
- Comparative analysis of 163 ant genomes reveals recurrent horizontal gene transfer from bacteria to ants.GigaScience · 2026Article
- Physics Determines and Evolution Shapes Basic Units of Protein Function and Allosteric Regulation.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026Review
- Structure-Function Relationship of the β-Hairpin ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- ARF: the most misunderstood GTPase I ever knew - why study ARF GAPs.Frontiers in molecular biosciences · 2025Review
- Tracing the birth and intrinsic disorder of loops and domains in protein evolution.Biophysical reviews · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Binding of nucleotides and their derivatives is one of the most ancient elementary functions dating back to the Origin of Life. We review here the works considering one of the key elements in binding of (di)nucleotide-containing ligands - phosphate binding. We start from a brief discussion of major participants, conditions, and events in prebiotic evolution that resulted in the Origin of Life. Tracing back to the basic functions, including metal and phosphate binding, and, potentially, formation of primitive protein-protein interactions, we focus here on the phosphate binding. Critically assessing works on the structural, functional, and evolutionary aspects of phosphate binding, we perform a simple computational experiment reconstructing its most ancient and generic sequence prototype. The profiles of the phosphate binding signatures have been derived in form of position-specific scoring matrices (PSSMs), their peculiarities depending on the type of the ligands have been analyzed, and evolutionary connections between them have been delineated. Then, the apparent prototype that gave rise to all relevant phosphate-binding signatures had also been reconstructed. We show that two major signatures of the phosphate binding that discriminate between the binding of dinucleotide- and nucleotide-containing ligands are GxGxxG and GxxGxG, respectively. It appears that the signature archetypal for dinucleotide-containing ligands is more generic, and it can frequently bind phosphate groups in nucleotide-containing ligands as well. The reconstructed prototype's key signature GxGGxG underlies the role of glycine residues in providing flexibility and interactions necessary for binding the phosphate groups. The prototype also contains other ancient amino acids, valine, and alanine, showing versatility towards evolutionary design and functional diversification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.