ArticleShoulder & elbow2024
Biomechanical comparison of pectoralis major repair techniques: A systematic review and meta-regression.
Article in Shoulder & elbow, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Primary Pectoralis Major Tendon Repair Using Suture Anchors With Internal Bracing: A Surgical Technique.Arthroscopy techniques · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: There are many surgical techniques when repairing pectoralis major tears. However, there is no clear consensus on which repair technique is biomechanically superior. Our purpose was to perform a systematic review and meta-regression to evaluate the most biomechanically superior pectoralis major repair technique. Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-regression of six human cadaveric biomechanical studies evaluating fixation techniques for pectoralis major repairs. The primary outcome was the ultimate failure load. Covariates included cadaveric age, bone mineral density, implants, suture, and stitch method. Meta-regression accounted for differences in variables. Results: Compared with Krackow/Bunnell stitch method, the modified Mason-Allen stitch demonstrated a decrease in ultimate failure load by 220.6 N (95% CI, -273.0 to -168.2; Discussion: We found the combination of suture tape in a whipstitch or Krackow/Bunnell stitch utilizing transosseous sutures or unicortical buttons is the most biomechanically superior construct for pectoralis major repairs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.