Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38655404›Full record

ReviewShoulder & elbow2024

A systematic review of the treatment of distal humerus fractures in older adults: A comparison of surgical and non-surgical options.

Michael T Stoddart, Georgios N Panagopoulos, Richard S Craig, Mark Falworth, David Butt, Will Rudge, Deborah Higgs, Addie Majed

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Shoulder & elbow, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michael T StoddartShoulder & Elbow Service, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7346-324X
Georgios N PanagopoulosShoulder & Elbow Service, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, UK.
Richard S CraigNuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and Musculoskeletal Sciences (NDORMS), Botnar Research Centre, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK.
Mark FalworthShoulder & Elbow Service, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, UK.
David ButtShoulder & Elbow Service, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, UK.
Will RudgeShoulder & Elbow Service, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, UK.
Deborah HiggsShoulder & Elbow Service, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, UK.
Addie MajedShoulder & Elbow Service, Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, Stanmore, UK.
Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital · GBNuffield Orthopaedic Centre · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Fractures of the distal humerus are a common fragility fracture in older adults. The purpose of this study was to systematically review the literature to produce pooled estimates of the outcomes of treatment using total elbow arthroplasty (TEA), open reduction and locking plate fixation (ORIF), hemiarthroplasty or with conservative management. Methods: A systematic review of PUBMED and EMBASE databases was conducted for studies reporting outcomes of intra-articular fractures in older adults. Data extracted included patient-reported outcome measures as well as clinical outcomes including ROM, adverse events and all-cause reoperation rates. Results: Forty-eight studies met the inclusion criteria and included 1838 acute, intra-articular distal humeral fractures. There was no clinically important difference in patient-reported pain and function measured on the Mayo Elbow Performance Score (TEA = 89.3 (SD 20.0), Hemi = 88.4 (SD 10.6), internal fixation = 85.0 (SD 14.7), non-operative = 85.1 (SD 11.0)). Discussion: Each of the treatment modalities studies resulted in a reasonable level of elbow function. The included studies were largely non-comparative and at considerable risk of bias. As elbow replacement surgery becomes centralised in the UK, there is a real need for high-quality comparative research studies to inform practice.

Indexed as

distal humerus fractureelbow hemiarthroplastyelderlyinternal fixationnon-operativetotal elbow arthroplastytrauma

Identifiers

PMID38655404
PMCPMC11034469
OpenAlexW4229455160

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.