ArticleClinical Medicine Insights. Oncology2024
Utility of
Article in Clinical Medicine Insights. Oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Imaging of cancer of unknown primary: a systematic literature review of the past, present, and future.The British journal of radiology · 2025Pooled it
- 18F-FDG PET/CT-Informed Multidisciplinary Reassessment Modifies Surgical Strategy in Patients with Metastatic Bone Disease: Exploratory Predictors of Decision Change in an Orthopedic Oncology Board.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Article
- Giant bilateral ovarian metastases from small primary pulmonary adenocarcinoma: from dilemma to diagnosis.EJNMMI research · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Cancer of unknown primary (CUP) is difficult to diagnose and classify clinically, and the disease develops rapidly. Therefore, the primary tumor detected in patients with CUP plays a profound role in the diagnosis and treatment of patients. The search for the primary tumor of CUP is also one of the indications for 18F-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose-positron emission tomography and computed tomography (FDG-PET/CT). Our objective was to evaluate the role of Methods: Sixty-two patients with CUP were selected from a database consisting of 18 802 cases in the Jiangsu Cancer Hospital PET/CT center from May 18, 2016 to November 18, 2022. Clinical data and changes in treatment strategies before and after PET/CT were collected. Results: A total of 42 primary tumors (42/62, 67.7%) were identified by PET/CT examination. The tumor staging of patients before conventional PET/CT imaging (such as CT/magnetic resonance imaging [MRI]/US) and after PET/CT did not change in 28 patients (28/62, 45.2%), whereas for 34 patients (34/62, 54.8%), tumor staging changed. Forty-five patients (45/62, 72.6%) had not developed treatment plans before PET/CT examination, but treatment plans were clarified after PET/CT examination. Thirteen patients (13/62, 21.0%) underwent changes in treatments before and after PET/CT examination. Among the 20 patients (20/62, 32.3%) whose primary tumors were not detected, 16 patients (16/20, 80.0%) had no treatment plans before PET/CT and the treatment plans were defined after PET/CT, 3 patients (3/20, 15.0%) changed the treatment plans before and after PET/CT, and 1 patient (1/20, 5.0%) did not change the treatment plan. Conclusions: The
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.