Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38655380›Full record

ArticleImplementation research and practice

Primary care-based screening and recruitment for an adolescent depression prevention trial: Contextual considerations during a youth mental health crisis.

Amanda K Knepper, Rebecca T Feinstein, Jennifer Sanchez-Flack, Marian Fitzgibbon, Cheryl Lefaiver, Ashley McHugh, Tracy R G Gladstone, Benjamin W Van Voorhees

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Implementation research and practice. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04290754 (PATH 2 Purpose), which is not on this map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04290754 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

PATH 2 Purpose: Primary Care and Community-Based Prevention of Mental Disorders in Adolescents

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Illinois at ChicagoRan2020 to 2026Enrolled636ConditionsDepressionArmsCATCH-IT, TEAMS
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Amanda K KnepperDepartment of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0746-9640
Rebecca T FeinsteinDepartment of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Jennifer Sanchez-FlackDepartment of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Marian FitzgibbonDepartment of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Cheryl LefaiverAdvocate Aurora Research Institute, Advocate Aurora Health, Downers Grove, IL, USA.
Ashley McHughAdvocate Aurora Research Institute, Advocate Aurora Health, Downers Grove, IL, USA.
Tracy R G GladstoneBehavioral and Social Sciences, Brown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, USA.
Benjamin W Van VoorheesDepartment of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign · USWellesley College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Rising rates of adolescent depression in the wake of COVID-19 and a youth mental health crisis highlight the urgent need for accessible mental healthcare and prevention within primary care. Digital mental health interventions (DMHIs) may increase access for underserved populations. However, these interventions are not well studied in adolescents, nor healthcare settings. The purpose of this study was to identify barriers and facilitators to screening and recruitment activities for Method: This qualitative study is a component of a larger Hybrid Type I trial. We conducted semi-structured key informant interviews with clinical and non-clinical implementers involved with screening and recruitment for the P2P trial. Informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR), interviews were conducted at the midpoint of the trial to identify barriers, facilitators, and needed adaptations, and to gather information on determinants that may affect future implementation. Findings: Respondents perceived the P2P trial as valuable, well aligned with the mission of their health systems. However, several barriers were identified, many of which stemmed from influences outside of the healthcare settings. Universal and site-specific outer setting influences (COVID-19 pandemic, youth mental health crisis, local community conditions) interacted with Inner Setting and Innovation domains to create numerous challenges to the implementation of screening and recruitment. Conclusion: Our findings emphasize the need for ongoing, comprehensive assessment of dynamic inner and outer setting contexts prior to and during implementation of clinical trials, as well as flexibility for adaptation to unique clinical contexts. The CFIR is useful for assessing determinants during times of rapid inner and outer setting change, such as those brought on by the COVID-19 pandemic, youth mental health crisis, and the corresponding exacerbation of resource strain within healthcare settings. Clinical trial registration: PATH 2 Purpose: Primary Care and Community-Based Prevention of Mental Disorders in Adolescents https://www.clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04290754.

Indexed as

children/child and adolescent/youth/familyimplementation evaluationinner contextouter contextpreventionqualitative methods

Identifiers

PMID38655380
PMCPMC11036909
OpenAlexW4394999947

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.