Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38655366›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

GC-IMS and multivariate analyses of volatile organic components in different Chinese breeds of chickens.

Hongqiang Li, Xiangmin Zhao, Shizhen Qin, Jinlu Li, Defu Tang, Bin Xi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hongqiang LiCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, 730070, China.
Xiangmin ZhaoCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, 730070, China.
Shizhen QinCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, 730070, China.
Jinlu LiCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, 730070, China.
Defu TangCollege of Animal Science and Technology, Gansu Agricultural University, Lanzhou, 730070, China.
Bin XiLaboratory of Quality & Safety Risk Assessment for Livestock Products of Ministry of Agriculture, Lanzhou Institute of Husbandry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Lanzhou, 730050, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study examined the difference in volatile flavor characteristics among four different local breeds of chicken by headspace gas chromatography-ion mobility spectrometry (HS-GC-IMS) combined with multivariate analysis. In total, 65 volatile organic compounds (VOCs) were identified (17 aldehydes, 12 alcohols, 7 ketones, 5 esters, 2 acids, and 22 unidentified, i.e., 26.15% aldehydes, 18.46% alcohols, 10.77% ketones, 7.69% esters, 3.08% acids, and 33.84% unidentified), of which 43 were annotated. The chicken meats from the four breeds exhibited good separation in topographic plots, VOC fingerprinting, and multivariate analysis. Meanwhile, 20 different volatile components, with variable importance in projection value > 1, were selected as potential markers to distinguish different breeds of chicken by partial least squares discriminant analysis (PLS-DA). These findings provide insights into the flavor traits of chicken meat. Also, HS-GC-IMS combined with multivariate analysis can be a convenient and powerful method for characterizing different meats.

Indexed as

Chicken meatDifferent breedsHS-GC-IMSMultivariate analysisVolatile flavor

Identifiers

PMID38655366
PMCPMC11035028

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.