ArticleHeliyon2024
Automated detection of otosclerosis with interpretable deep learning using temporal bone computed tomography images.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- The SAPIENS 3D-printed temporal bone model: a real tool for advanced otologic surgery education.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aimed to develop an automated detection schema for otosclerosis with interpretable deep learning using temporal bone computed tomography images. Methods: With approval from the institutional review board, we retrospectively analyzed high-resolution computed tomography scans of the temporal bone of 182 participants with otosclerosis (67 male subjects and 115 female subjects; average age, 36.42 years) and 157 participants without otosclerosis (52 male subjects and 102 female subjects; average age, 30.61 years) using deep learning. Transfer learning with the pretrained VGG19, Mask RCNN, and EfficientNet models was used. In addition, 3 clinical experts compared the system's performance by reading the same computed tomography images for a subset of 35 unseen subjects. An area under the receiver operating characteristic curve and a saliency map were used to further evaluate the diagnostic performance. Results: In prospective unseen test data, the diagnostic performance of the automatically interpretable otosclerosis detection system at the optimal threshold was 0.97 and 0.98 for sensitivity and specificity, respectively. In comparison with the clinical acumen of otolaryngologists at P < 0.05, the proposed system was not significantly different. Moreover, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve for the proposed system was 0.99, indicating satisfactory diagnostic accuracy. Conclusion: Our research develops and evaluates a deep learning system that detects otosclerosis at a level comparable with clinical otolaryngologists. Our system is an effective schema for the differential diagnosis of otosclerosis in computed tomography examinations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.