ArticleHeliyon2024
Optimized decomposition of fresh tomato remnants in facility soil.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To return vegetable remnants to soil in situ and understand parameters that determine their decomposition efficiency, the tomato remnant length, soil moisture, soil temperature and dosage of a microbial decomposer (MD) have been evaluated through a laboratory experiment using a nylon mesh bag in this study. The results showed that the residual remnant weight, and total carbon content increased 28.49 % and 32.65 %, respectively with two different remnant lengths (∼0.5 cm and ∼2.5 cm), while the decay rate and organic carbon breakdown rate decreased by 6.14 % and 7.48 %, respectively. When the relative water content in soil increased, the residual remnant weight and total carbon content first decreased and then increased, while the trend of the decay rate (16.94 % with 80 % soil water content) and organic carbon breakdown rate (9.96 % with 60 % soil water content) were opposite. At a high MD dosage (7 % or 9 % of the total compost weight), both rates of remnants were greater than those at the low dosage (1 %), with an increase of 38.63 % or 36.19 % and 15.89 % or 15.78 %, respectively. With an increase in soil temperature, both residual remnant weight and total carbon content decreased first and then increased, while both decomposition rate and organic carbon breakdown rate increased first and then decreased by 27.35 % and 22.78 %, respectively at 45 °C, compared with those at 30 °C. It was concluded that the decomposition rate was significantly correlated with the remnant length and the MD dosage, while the organic carbon breakdown rate was significantly associated with all four parameters evaluated. The optimal decomposing efficiency was achieved through cutting tomato remnants to a length of ∼0.5 cm, maintaining soil relative moisture content at 89 %, keeping soil temperature at 50 °C, and adding 7 % microbial decomposer MD to chopped tomato cuttings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.