ArticleHeliyon2024
BP neural network-based analysis of the applicability of NMF in side-step cutting.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Although the spatio-temporal structure of muscle activation in cutting have been studied extensively, including time-varying motor primitives and time-invariant motor modules under various conditions, the factorisation methods suitable for cutting are unclear, and the extent to which each factorisation method loses information about movement during dimensionality reduction is uncertain. Research question: To clarify the extent to which NMF, PCA and ICA retain information about movement when downscaling, and to explore the factorisation method suitable for cutting. Methods: The kinematic data during cutting was captured with a Vicon motion capture system, from which the kinematic features of the pelvic centre of mass were calculated. NMF, PCA and ICA were used to obtain muscle synergies based on sEMG of the cutting at different angles, respectively. A back propagation neural network was constructed using temporal component of synergy as input and the kinematics data of pelvic as output. Calculation of the Hurst index using fractal analysis based on the temporal component of muscle synergy. Results: The quality of sEMG reconstruction is significantly higher with ICA ( Significance: NMF is suitable for extracting muscle synergies in all directions of cutting. Information related to movement may be lost when using PCA and ICA to extract the synergy of cutting. The high individual variability of muscle synergy in cutting may be responsible for the loss of movement information in muscle synergy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.