Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38655337›Full record

ArticleHeliyon2024

BP neural network-based analysis of the applicability of NMF in side-step cutting.

Zhengye Pan, Lushuai Liu, Xingman Li, Yunchao Ma

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zhengye PanCollege of Physical Education and Sports, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
Lushuai LiuCollege of Physical Education and Sports, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
Xingman LiCollege of Physical Education and Sports, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
Yunchao MaCollege of Physical Education and Sports, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, China.
Beijing Normal University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Although the spatio-temporal structure of muscle activation in cutting have been studied extensively, including time-varying motor primitives and time-invariant motor modules under various conditions, the factorisation methods suitable for cutting are unclear, and the extent to which each factorisation method loses information about movement during dimensionality reduction is uncertain. Research question: To clarify the extent to which NMF, PCA and ICA retain information about movement when downscaling, and to explore the factorisation method suitable for cutting. Methods: The kinematic data during cutting was captured with a Vicon motion capture system, from which the kinematic features of the pelvic centre of mass were calculated. NMF, PCA and ICA were used to obtain muscle synergies based on sEMG of the cutting at different angles, respectively. A back propagation neural network was constructed using temporal component of synergy as input and the kinematics data of pelvic as output. Calculation of the Hurst index using fractal analysis based on the temporal component of muscle synergy. Results: The quality of sEMG reconstruction is significantly higher with ICA ( Significance: NMF is suitable for extracting muscle synergies in all directions of cutting. Information related to movement may be lost when using PCA and ICA to extract the synergy of cutting. The high individual variability of muscle synergy in cutting may be responsible for the loss of movement information in muscle synergy.

Indexed as

BP neural networksFactorisation methodFractal analysiside-step cuttingMuscle synergy

Identifiers

PMID38655337
PMCPMC11036090
OpenAlexW4394789840

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.