ArticleExploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy2024
Formal leadership perceptions about the autonomy of Pharmacy: a SWOT analysis.
Article in Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.
- Beyond descriptive SWOT in pharmacy strategy: A quantitative framework for leaders, managers and educators from prioritization to strategic response.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2026Article
- Article
- ReflACTION framework: A proposed model for implementation of clinical pharmacy services.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2024Article
- Performance, interpersonal relationships and professional satisfaction: determinants to support pharmaceutical reengineering.Exploratory research in clinical and social pharmacy · 2024Article
- "Opportunities and responsibilities": how do pharmacists assess their professionalism?BMC medical education · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionAutonomy is considered a vital principle of professionalism. In recent years, despite important advances, the Pharmacy and pharmacists' autonomy has been questioned due to conflicts that jeopardize the consolidation of this profession in the division of work in health.
objectiveto understand the construct of autonomy based on perceptions of formal leaders associated with professional organizations.
methodsA qualitative study was conducted through interviews with key informants. The data obtained were submitted to content analysis.
resultsPerceptions about the autonomy in pharmaceutical practice were categorized according to strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats to this construct.
conclusionThe findings allowed us to understand the autonomy of pharmaceutical practice in Brazil, generate hypotheses about the future of Pharmacy, and build strategies to maintain its occupational status.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.