Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38655154›Full record

ArticleTranslational sports medicine2022

Biceps Femoris Fascicle Lengths Increase after Hamstring Injury Rehabilitation to a Greater Extent in the Injured Leg.

Rod Whiteley, Jack T Hickey, Robin Vermeulen, Ryan Timmins, Thomas M Best, Ebonie Rio, David Opar

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational sports medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Rod WhiteleyRehabilitation Department, Aspetar Sports Medicine Hospital, Doha, Qatar.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1452-6228
Jack T HickeySchool of Behavioural and Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2764-698X
Robin VermeulenRehabilitation Department, Aspetar Sports Medicine Hospital, Doha, Qatar.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9456-8892
Ryan TimminsSchool of Behavioural and Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4964-1848
Thomas M BestDepartment of Orthopedics, University of Miami Sports Medicine Institute, Miller School of Medicine, Coral Gables, FL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2836-161X
Ebonie RioLa Trobe Sport and Exercise Medicine Research Centre, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6854-929X
David OparSchool of Behavioural and Health Sciences, Australian Catholic University, Melbourne, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8354-6353
Australian Catholic University · AULa Trobe University · AUQatar Orthopaedic and Sports Medicine Hospital · QAThe University of Queensland · AUUniversity of Miami · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Document changes in fascicle length during rehabilitation from hamstring injury of the injured and uninjured legs and secondarily to describe any association between these changes and reinjury rate. Design: Multicentre case series. Methods: Fifty-two prospectively included hamstring injured athletes had their biceps femoris long head fascicle lengths measured at the start and end of rehabilitation using two-dimensional ultrasound. Absolute and relative changes in fascicle length were compared for each leg using linear mixed models. Participants were followed for six months after being cleared to return to sport for any reinjury. Fascicle lengths and rehabilitation duration were compared for those who reinjured and those who did not. Results: Injured leg fascicle length was shorter at the start of rehabilitation (9.1 cm compared to 9.8 cm, Conclusions: While both injured and uninjured legs displayed increases in fascicle length during rehabilitation, the larger fascicle length increases in the injured leg suggest that either a different training stimulus was applied during rehabilitation to each leg or there was a different response to training and/or recovery from injury in the injured leg. Reinjury risk appears to be independent of fascicle length changes in this cohort, but the small number of reinjuries makes any conclusions speculative.

Identifiers

PMID38655154
PMCPMC11022767
OpenAlexW4296831548

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.