Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38655143›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2024

Ultrasensitive PSA: rethinking post-surgical management for node positive prostate cancer.

Jonathan A Aguiar, Eric V Li, Austin Ho, Richard Bennett, Yutai Li, Clayton Neill, Edward M Schaeffer, Hiten D Patel, Ashley E Ross

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05512754 (Randomized Controlled Trial of Anti-inflammatory Medications in Patients With Elevated Serum Prostate-specific Antigen), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05512754 phase4recruitingnot on this map

Randomized Controlled Trial of Anti-inflammatory Medications in Patients With Elevated Serum Prostate-specific Antigen

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of ChicagoRan2022 to 2027Enrolled200ConditionsElevated Serum PSAArmsIbuprofen 400 mg
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jonathan A AguiarFeinberg School of Medicine, Department of Urology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States.
Eric V LiFeinberg School of Medicine, Department of Urology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States.
Austin HoFeinberg School of Medicine, Department of Urology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States.
Richard BennettFeinberg School of Medicine, Department of Urology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States.
Yutai LiFeinberg School of Medicine, Department of Urology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States.
Clayton NeillFeinberg School of Medicine, Department of Urology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States.
Edward M SchaefferFeinberg School of Medicine, Department of Urology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States.
Hiten D Patel *Feinberg School of Medicine, Department of Urology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States.
Ashley E Ross *Feinberg School of Medicine, Department of Urology, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL, United States.
Northwestern University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Clinicians may offer patients with positive lymph nodes (pN1) and undetectable PSA following surgery for prostate cancer either observation or adjuvant therapy based on AUA, EAU, and NCCN guidelines considering standard PSA detection thresholds of <0.1ng/ml. Here we sought to investigate the outcomes of pN1 patients in the era of ultrasensitive PSA testing. Methods: We queried the Northwestern Electronic Data Warehouse for patients with prostate cancer who were pN1 at radical prostatectomy and followed with ultrasensitive PSA. Patients receiving neoadjuvant treatment were excluded. We compared clinical characteristics including age, race, pre-operative PSA, Gleason grade, tumor stage, surgical margins, and nodal specimens to identify factors associated with achievement and maintenance of an undetectable PSA (defined as <0.01 ng/mL). Statistics were performed using t-test, Mann-Whitney U test, chi-squared analysis, and logistic regression with significance defined as p<0.05. Results: From 2018-2023, 188 patients were included. Subsequently, 39 (20.7%) had a PSA decline to undetectable levels (<0.01 ng/mL) post-operatively at a median time of 63 days. Seven percent of these men (3/39) were treated with adjuvant RT + ADT with undetectable PSA levels. 13/39 (33.3%) had eventual rises in PSA to ≥0.01 ng/mL for which they underwent salvage RT with ADT. Overall, 23/39 (59%) patients achieved and maintained undetectable PSA levels without subsequent therapy at median follow-up of 24.2 mo. Compared to patients with PSA persistence after surgery or elevations to detectable levels (≥0.01 ng/mL), patients who achieved and maintained undetectable levels had lower Gleason grades (p=0.03), lower tumor stage (p<0.001), fewer positive margins (p=0.02), and fewer involved lymph nodes (p=0.02). On multivariable analysis, only primary tumor (pT) stage was associated with achieving and maintaining an undetectable PSA; pT3b disease was associated with a 6.6-fold increased chance of developing a detectable PSA (p=0.03). Conclusion: Ultrasensitive PSA can aid initiation of early salvage therapy for lymph node positive patients after radical prostatectomy while avoiding overtreatment in a significant subset. 20% of patients achieved an undetectable PSA and over half of this subset remained undetectable after 2 years.

Indexed as

lymph node metastasesnode positive prostate cancerpost-surgical managementprostate cancerultrasensitive PSA

Identifiers

PMID38655143
PMCPMC11035792
OpenAlexW4394615644

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.