Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38655059›Full record

ArticleThe journal of physical chemistry. C, Nanomaterials and interfaces2024

The Excited-State Lifetime of Poly(NDI2OD-T2) Is Intrinsically Short.

Melissa K Gish, Chamikara D Karunasena, Joshua M Carr, William P Kopcha, Ann L Greenaway, Aiswarya Abhisek Mohapatra, Junxiang Zhang, Aniruddha Basu, Victor Brosius, Saied Md Pratik and 6 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of physical chemistry. C, Nanomaterials and interfaces, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Melissa K GishMaterials, Chemical, and Computational Science Directorate, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, Colorado 80401, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9886-3626
Chamikara D KarunasenaDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721-0041, United States.
Joshua M CarrRenewable and Sustainable Energy Institute, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado 80309, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2125-8759
William P KopchaMaterials, Chemical, and Computational Science Directorate, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, Colorado 80401, United States.
Ann L GreenawayMaterials, Chemical, and Computational Science Directorate, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, Colorado 80401, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6681-9965
Aiswarya Abhisek MohapatraRenewable and Sustainable Energy Institute, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado 80309, United States.
Junxiang ZhangRenewable and Sustainable Energy Institute, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado 80309, United States.
Aniruddha BasuRenewable and Sustainable Energy Institute, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado 80309, United States.
Victor BrosiusRenewable and Sustainable Energy Institute, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado 80309, United States.
Saied Md PratikDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721-0041, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4900-4323
Jean-Luc BredasDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721-0041, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7278-4471
Veaceslav CoropceanuDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, The University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721-0041, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1693-2315
Stephen BarlowRenewable and Sustainable Energy Institute, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado 80309, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9059-9974
Seth R MarderRenewable and Sustainable Energy Institute, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado 80309, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6921-2536
Andrew J FergusonMaterials, Chemical, and Computational Science Directorate, National Renewable Energy Laboratory, Golden, Colorado 80401, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2544-1753
Obadiah G ReidRenewable and Sustainable Energy Institute, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, Colorado 80309, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0646-3981

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Conjugated polymers composed of alternating electron donor and acceptor segments have come to dominate the materials being considered for organic photoelectrodes and solar cells, in large part because of their favorable near-infrared absorption. The prototypical electron-transporting push-pull polymer poly(NDI2OD-T2) (N2200) is one such material. While reasonably efficient organic solar cells can be fabricated with N2200 as the acceptor, it generally fails to contribute as much photocurrent from its absorption bands as the donor with which it is paired. Moreover, transient absorption studies have shown N2200 to have a consistently short excited-state lifetime (∼100 ps) that is dominated by a ground-state recovery. In this paper, we investigate whether these characteristics are intrinsic to the backbone structure of this polymer or if these are extrinsic effects from ubiquitous solution-phase and thin-film aggregates. We compare the solution-phase photophysics of N2200 with those of a pair of model compounds composed of alternating bithiophene (T2) donor and naphthalene diimide (NDI) acceptor units, NDI-T2-NDI and T2-NDI-T2, in a dilute solution. We find that the model compounds have even faster ground-state recovery dynamics (τ = 45, 27 ps) than the polymer (τ = 133 ps), despite remaining molecularly isolated in solution. In these molecules, as in the case of the N2200 polymer, the lowest excited state has a T2 to NDI charge-transfer (CT) character. Electronic-structure calculations indicate that the short lifetime of this state is due to fast nonradiative decay to the ground state (GS) promoted by strong CT-GS electronic coupling and strong electron-vibrational coupling with high-frequency (quantum) normal modes.

Identifiers

PMID38655059
PMCPMC11033933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.