ReviewTaiwan journal of ophthalmology
Large-diameter deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty: A narrative review.
Review in Taiwan journal of ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Transmission Electron Microscopy Corneal Ultrastructure Study in Hematocornea of Corneal Transplant Graft.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Long-Term Graft Survival and Visual Outcomes in Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty (DALK): A Narrative Review.Journal of ophthalmology · 2026Review
- Mushroom Penetrating Keratoplasty: A Narrative Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) involves the selective replacement of diseased corneal stroma while preserving healthy unaffected endothelium. While DALK has failed to gain widespread popularity, improved visual and refractive outcomes of large-diameter grafts, which patients directly perceive following suture removal, may represent a compelling reason to shift toward DALK. Since the unaffected host endothelium is retained, DALK offers the opportunity to use large-diameter grafts, which reliably achieves maximum visual potential without an increased risk of immune-mediated stromal rejection. In this narrative review, we evaluate the current evidence on large-diameter DALK including surgical technique and clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.