Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38654885›Full record

ArticleSaudi journal of anaesthesia

Pericapsular nerve group block and lateral femoral cutaneous nerve block versus fascia iliaca block for multimodal analgesia after total hip replacement surgery: A retrospective analysis.

Alessandro Girombelli, Francesco Vetrone, Francesco Saglietti, Andrea Galimberti, Andrea Fusaro, Michele Umbrello, Angelo Pezzi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Saudi journal of anaesthesia. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Alessandro GirombelliDepartment of Anesthesiology, Division of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, EOC, Ospedale Regionale di Lugano, Lugano, Switzerland.
Francesco VetroneDepartment of Surgery and Emergency, Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, ASST Nord Milano, Bassini Hospital, Cinisello Balsamo (MI), Italy.
Francesco SagliettiDepartment of Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, Azienda Ospedaliera S. Croce e Carle, Cuneo (CN), Italy.
Andrea GalimbertiDepartment of Surgery and Emergency, Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, ASST Nord Milano, Bassini Hospital, Cinisello Balsamo (MI), Italy.
Andrea FusaroOrthopedic Surgery Division, ASST Nord Milano, Ospedale Bassini, Cinisello Balsamo (MI), Italy.
Michele UmbrelloAnesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, SC Anestesia e Rianimazione II, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo - Polo Universitario, Ospedale San Carlo Borromeo, Milano (MI), Italy.
Angelo PezziDepartment of Surgery and Emergency, Anesthesiology and Critical Care Medicine, ASST Nord Milano, Bassini Hospital, Cinisello Balsamo (MI), Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Optimal pain control with limited muscle weakness is paramount for a swift initiation of physical therapy and early discharge. Fascia iliaca compartment block (FICB) has been recommended since it offers good pain control with a low risk of motor block. Pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block with lateral femoral cutaneous block (LFCN) has been proposed as an effective alternative to FICB that offers better pain control with a considerably lower risk of motor block. We aimed to compare the aforementioned blocks and determine which one yielded the lowest numeric rating scale (NRS) score. Methods: We designed a retrospective analysis of patients undergoing elective total hip arthroplasty. The primary outcome was the NRS score at 6, 12, and 24 hours. The secondary outcomes were total opioid consumption, time to first PRN opioid, and time to first postoperative ambulation. Results: 52 patients were recruited, (13 PENG plus LFCN, 39 FICB). PENG plus LCFN resulted in a lower NRS at all three-time points (mean difference and 95%CI at 6 h 0.378 [-0.483; 1.240], at 12 h 0.336 [-0.378; 1.050], and at 24 h 0.464 [0.013; 0.914] Conclusions: PENG plus LCFN seems to offer better pain control and lead to less PRN opioids. Neither block hindered physical therapy nor ambulation. These results need to be confirmed with a larger prospective and randomized study.

Indexed as

AnesthesiaFIChipLFCNPENGregional

Identifiers

PMID38654885
PMCPMC11033891

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.