ArticleSaudi journal of anaesthesia
Tolerance to preoperative placement of electrodes for neuromuscular monitoring using the Tetragraph™.
Article in Saudi journal of anaesthesia. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Quantitative Train-of-Four Monitoring Using the TetraGraph™ to Evaluate Rocuronium Requirements During Renal Transplantation in a Pediatric Patient.Journal of medical cases · 2025Article
- Neuromuscular blockade monitoring in pediatric patients.Anesthesia and pain medicine · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Quantitative train-of-four (TOF) monitoring has recently been shown to be feasible in infants and children using a novel electromyography (EMG)-based monitor with a pediatric-sized self-adhesive sensor. However, placement of the sensor and initiation of TOF monitoring may require additional time in the operating room (OR), delaying workflow and the time to induction of anesthesia. The current study evaluates the feasibility of placing the self-adhesive sensor in the preoperative holding area in pediatric patients before arrival to the OR. Methods: Consented pediatric patients undergoing inpatient surgery requiring the administration of NMBAs were enrolled. The EMG electrode was placed along the ulnar nerve on the volar aspect of the distal forearm to provide neurostimulation. After the induction of anesthesia, monitoring was initiated and TOF recording started before the administration of the NMBA. A Likert score (0-10) was used to assess ease of placement, tolerability of the monitor during the preoperative period, and its ability to generate a recorded response in the OR. Results: The final study cohort included 40 patients with a median age of 3.7 years. Fourteen patients (35%) pulled off the sensor before arrival to the OR and 26 patients (65%) arrived at the OR with the sensor intact and functioning. Older children were more likely to maintain the sensor until arrival to the OR compared to younger patients (median age of 5.24 versus 1 year, Conclusion: In patients more than 4 years of age, placement of the self-adhesive sensor for EMG-based TOF monitoring may be feasible. However, in younger patients, additional interventions may be required to achieve a similar success rate.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.