ReviewSaudi journal of anaesthesia
Applications of artificial intelligence in anesthesia: A systematic review.
Review in Saudi journal of anaesthesia. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.
- Artificial intelligence in anaesthesiology: why don't we have it in our hands after a decade of innovation? A systematic review and perspective.BMC anesthesiology · 2026Pooled it
- Large Language Models in Perioperative Antithrombotic Management: A Blinded Scenario-Based Expert Evaluation.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Airway Management: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives.Cureus · 2026Review
- Transforming perioperative care: The current landscape and future trajectory of artificial intelligence in anesthesia-A narrative review.The Journal of international medical research · 2026Review
- Depth of anesthesia monitoring: Current evidence, clinical impact, and future directions.The Journal of international medical research · 2026Review
- Comparison of human-AI agreement in ASA scoring by gender and duration of clinical experience: a real-world study.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Factors influencing the availability of anesthesiologists: a scoping review.Human resources for health · 2025Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Anesthesia: Enhancing Precision, Safety, and Global Access Through Data-Driven Systems.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- From static to dynamic: Artificial intelligence revolution in perioperative care through multimodal data fusion and closed-loop optimization.Journal of anesthesia and translational medicine · 2025Review
- The future of precision orthopaedics: personalized data-driven practice.Bone & joint open · 2025Article
- Comparison of AI applications and anesthesiologist's anesthesia method choices.BMC anesthesiology · 2025Article
- Artificial intelligence revolutionizing anesthesia management: advances and prospects in intelligent anesthesia technology.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Review
- Reshaping Anesthesia with Artificial Intelligence: From Concept to Reality.Anesthesia and critical care (Houston, Tex.) · 2025Article
- Harnessing Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Anaesthesiology: Enhancing Patient Outcomes and Clinical Efficiency.Cureus · 2024Review
- Regional Anaesthesia, Contemporary Techniques, and Associated Advancements: A Narrative Review.Cureus · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This review article examines the utility of artificial intelligence (AI) in anesthesia, with a focus on recent developments and future directions in the field. A total of 19,300 articles were available on the given topic after searching in the above mentioned databases, and after choosing the custom range of years from 2015 to 2023 as an inclusion component, only 12,100 remained. 5,720 articles remained after eliminating non-full text. Eighteen papers were identified to meet the inclusion criteria for the review after applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The applications of AI in anesthesia after studying the articles were in favor of the use of AI as it enhanced or equaled human judgment in drug dose decision and reduced mortality by early detection. Two studies tried to formulate prediction models, current techniques, and limitations of AI; ten studies are mainly focused on pain and complications such as hypotension, with a P value of <0.05; three studies tried to formulate patient outcomes with the help of AI; and three studies are mainly focusing on how drug dose delivery is calculated (median: 1.1% ± 0.5) safely and given to the patients with applications of AI. In conclusion, the use of AI in anesthesia has the potential to revolutionize the field and improve patient outcomes. AI algorithms can accurately predict patient outcomes and anesthesia dosing, as well as monitor patients during surgery in real time. These technologies can help anesthesiologists make more informed decisions, increase efficiency, and reduce costs. However, the implementation of AI in anesthesia also presents challenges, such as the need to address issues of bias and privacy. As the field continues to evolve, it will be important to carefully consider the ethical implications of AI in anesthesia and ensure that these technologies are used in a responsible and transparent manner.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.