Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38654841›Full record

ArticleJournal of mixed methods research2023

Mixed Methods Community-Engaged Evaluation: Integrating Interventionist and Action Research Frameworks to Understand a Community-Building Violence Prevention Program.

Victoria L Banyard, Katie M Edwards, Andrew J Rizzo, Anna Segura-Montagut, Patricia Greenberg, Megan C Kearns

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of mixed methods research, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Victoria L BanyardRutgers University, School of Social Work, Center for Research on Ending Violence, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9645-5055
Katie M EdwardsUniversity of Nebraska, Nebraska Center for Research on Children, Youth, Families, and Schools Lincoln, NE, USA.
Andrew J RizzoUniversity of New Hampshire, Psychology Department, Durham, NH, USA.
Anna Segura-MontagutRutgers University, School of Social Work, Center for Research on Ending Violence, New Brunswick, NJ, USA.
Patricia GreenbergRutgers University, School of Public Health, Piscataway, NJ, USA.
Megan C KearnsCenters for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Funding

ACL HHS U01CE002652Intramural CDC HHS CC999999NCIPC CDC HHS U01 CE002652
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While mixed methods research can enhance studies of intervention outcomes and projects where research itself transforms communities through participatory approaches, methodologists need explicit examples. As the field of interpersonal violence prevention increasingly embraces community-level prevention strategies, it may benefit from research methods that mirror community-building prevention processes. A multiphase mixed methods study with sequential and convergent components assessed the feasibility, and impact of a prevention program to change social norms and increase collective efficacy in towns. Joint display analysis created a nuanced picture of the acceptability, feasibility, and impact of the program. This article contributes to the field of mixed methods research by bridging discussions of "interventionist" studies with models of community-based participatory mixed methods research into a combined community-engaged method.

Indexed as

interventionist researchmulti-phase mixed methodspreventionsexual violence

Identifiers

PMID38654841
PMCPMC11034737

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.