Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38654834›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in medicine2024

A protocol for annotation of total body photography for machine learning to analyze skin phenotype and lesion classification.

Clare A Primiero, Brigid Betz-Stablein, Nathan Ascott, Brian D'Alessandro, Seraphin Gaborit, Paul Fricker, Abigail Goldsteen, Sandra González-Villà, Katie Lee, Sana Nazari and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Independent assessment of the WHO Skin Neglected Tropical Diseases application for leprosy detection.Revista panamericana de salud publica = Pan American journal of public health · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 14 institutions in 9 countries.

Clare A PrimieroDermatology Department, Hospital Clinic and Fundació Clínic per la Recerca Biomèdica-IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain.
Brigid Betz-StableinFrazer Institute, The University of Queensland, Dermatology Research Centre, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Nathan AscottV7, London, United Kingdom.
Brian D'AlessandroCanfield Scientific Inc., Parsippany-Troy Hills, NJ, United States.
Seraphin GaboritISAHIT, Paris, France.
Paul FrickerTorus Actions & Belle.ai, Ramonville-Saint-Agne, France.
Abigail GoldsteenIBM Research, Haifa, Israel.
Sandra González-VillàCoronis Computing SL, Girona, Spain.
Katie LeeFrazer Institute, The University of Queensland, Dermatology Research Centre, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Sana NazariComputer Vision and Robotics Group, University of Girona, Girona, Spain.
Hang NguyenTorus Actions & Belle.ai, Ramonville-Saint-Agne, France.
Valsamis NtouskosRemote Sensing Lab, National Technical University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
Frederik PahdeFraunhofer Heinrich-Hertz Institute, Berlin, Germany.
Balázs E PatakiHUN-REN Institute for Computer Science and Control, Budapest, Hungary.
Josep QuintanaCoronis Computing SL, Girona, Spain.
Susana PuigDermatology Department, Hospital Clinic and Fundació Clínic per la Recerca Biomèdica-IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain.
Gisele G RezzeDermatology Department, Hospital Clinic and Fundació Clínic per la Recerca Biomèdica-IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain.
Rafael GarciaComputer Vision and Robotics Group, University of Girona, Girona, Spain.
H Peter SoyerFrazer Institute, The University of Queensland, Dermatology Research Centre, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
Josep MalvehyDermatology Department, Hospital Clinic and Fundació Clínic per la Recerca Biomèdica-IDIBAPS, Barcelona, Spain.
The University of Queensland · AUDépartement Sciences pour l’Action et le Développement · FRFundació Clínic per a la Recerca Biomèdica · ESHospital Quirónsalud Sagrado Corazón · ESUniversitat de Girona · ESCanfield Scientific (United States) · USCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red · ESFraunhofer Institute for Telecommunications, Heinrich Hertz Institute · DEIBM Research - Haifa · ILInstitute for Computer Science and Control · HUInstituto de Salud Carlos III · ESInternational School of Management · FRNational Technical University of Athens · GRValue Chain Lab (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Artificial Intelligence (AI) has proven effective in classifying skin cancers using dermoscopy images. In experimental settings, algorithms have outperformed expert dermatologists in classifying melanoma and keratinocyte cancers. However, clinical application is limited when algorithms are presented with 'untrained' or out-of-distribution lesion categories, often misclassifying benign lesions as malignant, or misclassifying malignant lesions as benign. Another limitation often raised is the lack of clinical context (e.g., medical history) used as input for the AI decision process. The increasing use of Total Body Photography (TBP) in clinical examinations presents new opportunities for AI to perform holistic analysis of the whole patient, rather than a single lesion. Currently there is a lack of existing literature or standards for image annotation of TBP, or on preserving patient privacy during the machine learning process. Methods: This protocol describes the methods for the acquisition of patient data, including TBP, medical history, and genetic risk factors, to create a comprehensive dataset for machine learning. 500 patients of various risk profiles will be recruited from two clinical sites (Australia and Spain), to undergo temporal total body imaging, complete surveys on sun behaviors and medical history, and provide a DNA sample. This patient-level metadata is applied to image datasets using DICOM labels. Anonymization and masking methods are applied to preserve patient privacy. A two-step annotation process is followed to label skin images for lesion detection and classification using deep learning models. Skin phenotype characteristics are extracted from images, including innate and facultative skin color, nevi distribution, and UV damage. Several algorithms will be developed relating to skin lesion detection, segmentation and classification, 3D mapping, change detection, and risk profiling. Simultaneously, explainable AI (XAI) methods will be incorporated to foster clinician and patient trust. Additionally, a publicly released dataset of anonymized annotated TBP images will be released for an international challenge to advance the development of new algorithms using this type of data. Conclusion: The anticipated results from this protocol are validated AI-based tools to provide holistic risk assessment for individual lesions, and risk stratification of patients to assist clinicians in monitoring for skin cancer.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencecomputer—aided diagnosiscomputer image analysesdermatologymelanomatotal body photography

Identifiers

PMID38654834
PMCPMC11035726
OpenAlexW4394618970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.