ArticleCureus2024
Comparing Feto-Maternal Outcomes in Pregnant Women With Normal and Abnormal Liver Function Tests: A Prospective Observational Study.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
- Maternal glycemic profiles during pregnancy and predelivery correlate with neonatal glucose homeostasis and jaundice risk: a prospective cohort study.Translational pediatrics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPregnant women with abnormal liver function tests (LFTs) require proper evaluation and timely management to reduce maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality.
objectiveThe present study was done with the objective of determining feto-maternal outcomes in antenatal women with abnormal LFTs and comparing them with antenatal women having normal liver function. The prevalence and possible causes of derangements in LFT were also identified.
methodPregnant women referred to an antenatal clinic for several reasons pertaining to abnormal liver functions, and those admitted to the labor room for delivery with abnormal LFTs were included in the study. The pregnant women with abnormal LFT were studied prospectively, and they were compared with pregnant women having normal LFT. The fetal and maternal outcomes were also noted.
resultsThe pregnant women attending the antenatal clinic with a history of pruritus, abdominal pain, jaundice, nausea/vomiting, hypertension ascites, etc. and delivered at our facility were evaluated. One hundred and eight women had abnormal LFT defined by criteria laid down in material and methods. Eighty-seven women with normal LFT were taken for comparison. In the abnormal LFT, the main cause was intrahepatic cholestasis of pregnancy (IHCP). There were 6 (5.5%) maternal deaths in this group and none in the normal LFTs. There were 6 (5.6%) fetal deaths and 4 (4.6%) in the other group (p-value=1). The prevalence of abnormal LFT was 9.11% throughout pregnancy. Increased bilirubin and alkaline phosphatase (ALP) were significantly correlated with maternal mortality, while gestational age at birth, presence of meconium, appearance, pulse, grimace, activity, and respiration (APGAR) score, maternal mortality, and raised alkaline phosphatase level were found to be significantly associated with fetal mortality.
conclusionPatients with abnormal LFT were significantly associated with maternal morbidity and mortality. However, fetal outcomes in patients with abnormal and normal LFT were similar. Hyperbilirubinemia and raised alanine aminotransferase (ALT) were significant predictors of maternal mortality.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.