Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38654762›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in radiology2024

A systematic review of artificial intelligence tools for chronic pulmonary embolism on CT pulmonary angiography.

Lojain Abdulaal, Ahmed Maiter, Mahan Salehi, Michael Sharkey, Turki Alnasser, Pankaj Garg, Smitha Rajaram, Catherine Hill, Christopher Johns, Alex Matthew Knox Rothman and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in radiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Lojain AbdulaalDepartment of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Ahmed MaiterDepartment of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Mahan SalehiDepartment of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Michael SharkeyDepartment of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Turki AlnasserDepartment of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Pankaj GargFaculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, United Kingdom.
Smitha RajaramDepartment of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Catherine HillRespiratory Physiology Department, Sheffield Pulmonary Vascular Disease Unit, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Christopher JohnsDepartment of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Alex Matthew Knox RothmanDepartment of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Krit DwivediDepartment of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
David G KielyDepartment of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Samer AlabedDepartment of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
Andrew James SwiftDepartment of Infection, Immunity and Cardiovascular Disease, The University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
University of Sheffield · GBPulmonary Vascular Research Institute · GBNational Institute for Health Research · GBKing Abdulaziz University · SAUniversity of East Anglia · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Chronic pulmonary embolism (PE) may result in pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH). Automated CT pulmonary angiography (CTPA) interpretation using artificial intelligence (AI) tools has the potential for improving diagnostic accuracy, reducing delays to diagnosis and yielding novel information of clinical value in CTEPH. This systematic review aimed to identify and appraise existing studies presenting AI tools for CTPA in the context of chronic PE and CTEPH. Methods: MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched on 11 September 2023. Journal publications presenting AI tools for CTPA in patients with chronic PE or CTEPH were eligible for inclusion. Information about model design, training and testing was extracted. Study quality was assessed using compliance with the Checklist for Artificial Intelligence in Medical Imaging (CLAIM). Results: Five studies were eligible for inclusion, all of which presented deep learning AI models to evaluate PE. First study evaluated the lung parenchymal changes in chronic PE and two studies used an AI model to classify PE, with none directly assessing the pulmonary arteries. In addition, a separate study developed a CNN tool to distinguish chronic PE using 2D maximum intensity projection reconstructions. While another study assessed a novel automated approach to quantify hypoperfusion to help in the severity assessment of CTEPH. While descriptions of model design and training were reliable, descriptions of the datasets used in training and testing were more inconsistent. Conclusion: In contrast to AI tools for evaluation of acute PE, there has been limited investigation of AI-based approaches to characterising chronic PE and CTEPH on CTPA. Existing studies are limited by inconsistent reporting of the data used to train and test their models. This systematic review highlights an area of potential expansion for the field of AI in medical image interpretation.There is limited knowledge of A systematic review of artificial intelligence tools for chronic pulmonary embolism in CT. This systematic review provides an assessment on research that examined deep learning algorithms in detecting CTEPH on CTPA images, the number of studies assessing the utility of deep learning on CTPA in CTEPH was unclear and should be highlighted.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencechronic pulmonary embolism (CPE)chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH)computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA)deep learning

Identifiers

PMID38654762
PMCPMC11035730
OpenAlexW4394615933

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.