Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38654735›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neurology2024

Machine learning approach for ambient-light-corrected parameters and the Pupil Reactivity (PuRe) score in smartphone-based pupillometry.

Aleksander Bogucki, Ivo John, Łukasz Zinkiewicz, Michał Jachura, Damian Jaworski, Karolina Suwała, Hugo Chrost, Michal Wlodarski, Jakub Kałużny, Doug Campbell and 4 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Aleksander Bogucki *Solvemed Inc., Lewes, DE, United States.
Ivo John *Solvemed Inc., Lewes, DE, United States.
Łukasz ZinkiewiczSolvemed Inc., Lewes, DE, United States.
Michał JachuraSolvemed Inc., Lewes, DE, United States.
Damian JaworskiOftalmika Eye Hospital, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Karolina SuwałaOftalmika Eye Hospital, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Hugo ChrostSolvemed Inc., Lewes, DE, United States.
Michal WlodarskiSolvemed Inc., Lewes, DE, United States.
Jakub KałużnyOftalmika Eye Hospital, Bydgoszcz, Poland.
Doug CampbellSpace Medicine Group, International Institute for Astronautical Sciences, Boulder, CO, United States.
Paul BakkenSpace Medicine Group, International Institute for Astronautical Sciences, Boulder, CO, United States.
Shawna PandyaSpace Medicine Group, International Institute for Astronautical Sciences, Boulder, CO, United States.
Radosław ChrapkiewiczSolvemed Inc., Lewes, DE, United States.
Sanjay G ManoharSolvemed Inc., Lewes, DE, United States.
University of Bydgoszcz · PL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: The pupillary light reflex (PLR) is the constriction of the pupil in response to light. The PLR in response to a pulse of light follows a complex waveform that can be characterized by several parameters. It is a sensitive marker of acute neurological deterioration, but is also sensitive to the background illumination in the environment in which it is measured. To detect a pathological change in the PLR, it is therefore necessary to separate the contributions of neuro-ophthalmic factors from ambient illumination. Illumination varies over several orders of magnitude and is difficult to control due to diurnal, seasonal, and location variations. Methods and results: We assessed the sensitivity of seven PLR parameters to differences in ambient light, using a smartphone-based pupillometer (AI Pupillometer, Solvemed Inc.). Nine subjects underwent 345 measurements in ambient conditions ranging from complete darkness (<5 lx) to bright lighting (≲10,000 lx). Lighting most strongly affected the initial pupil size, constriction amplitude, and velocity. Nonlinear models were fitted to find the correction function that maximally stabilized PLR parameters across different ambient light levels. Next, we demonstrated that the lighting-corrected parameters still discriminated reactive from unreactive pupils. Ten patients underwent PLR testing in an ophthalmology outpatient clinic setting following the administration of tropicamide eye drops, which rendered the pupils unreactive. The parameters corrected for lighting were combined as predictors in a machine learning model to produce a scalar value, the Pupil Reactivity (PuRe) score, which quantifies Pupil Reactivity on a scale 0-5 (0, non-reactive pupil; 0-3, abnormal/"sluggish" response; 3-5, normal/brisk response). The score discriminated unreactive pupils with 100% accuracy and was stable under changes in ambient illumination across four orders of magnitude. Discussion: This is the first time that a correction method has been proposed to effectively mitigate the confounding influence of ambient light on PLR measurements, which could improve the reliability of pupillometric parameters both in pre-hospital and inpatient care settings. In particular, the PuRe score offers a robust measure of Pupil Reactivity directly applicable to clinical practice. Importantly, the formulae behind the score are openly available for the benefit of the clinical research community.

Indexed as

Artificial Intelligence (AI)critical careintensive care unitneurocritical carepupillary light reflex (PLR)pupillometryPupil ReactivityPupil Reactivity (PuRe) score

Identifiers

PMID38654735
PMCPMC11037402
OpenAlexW4394603358

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.