Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38654710›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2024

Highly diverse cuticular hydrocarbon profiles but no evidence for aggression towards non-kin in the ambrosia beetle

Antoine Melet, Viesturs Leibold, Thomas Schmitt, Peter H W Biedermann

Erratum issuedOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Antoine MeletChair of Forest Entomology and Protection, Faculty of Environment and Natural Resources Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5500-4274
Viesturs LeiboldDepartment of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, Biocentre University of Würzburg Würzburg Germany.
Thomas SchmittDepartment of Animal Ecology and Tropical Biology, Biocentre University of Würzburg Würzburg Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6719-8635
Peter H W BiedermannChair of Forest Entomology and Protection, Faculty of Environment and Natural Resources Albert-Ludwigs-Universität Freiburg Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4234-5659
University of Freiburg · DEUniversity of Würzburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animal societies use nestmate recognition to protect against social cheaters and parasites. In most social insect societies, individuals recognize and exclude any non-nestmates and the roles of cuticular hydrocarbons as recognition cues are well documented. Some ambrosia beetles live in cooperatively breeding societies with farmed fungus cultures that are challenging to establish, but of very high value once established. Hence, social cheaters that sneak into a nest without paying the costs of nest foundation may be selected. Therefore, nestmate recognition is also expected to exist in ambrosia beetles, but so far nobody has investigated this behavior and its underlying mechanisms. Here we studied the ability for nestmate recognition in the cooperatively breeding ambrosia beetle

Indexed as

chemical communicationcooperative breedingcuticular hydrocarbonsnestmate recognition

Identifiers

PMID38654710
PMCPMC11036074
OpenAlexW4395043925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.