Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38654707›Full record

ArticlePalliative & supportive care2024

Communicating visit information to family caregivers: How does method matter? A national survey.

Reed W R Bratches, Noah Z Freundlich, J Nicholas Odom, A James O'Malley, Paul J Barr

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Palliative & supportive care, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Reed W R BratchesCenter for Technology and Behavioral Health, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9446-7098
Noah Z FreundlichCenter for Technology and Behavioral Health, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA.
J Nicholas OdomSchool of Nursing, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6764-0254
A James O'MalleyCenter for Technology and Behavioral Health, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA.
Paul J BarrCenter for Technology and Behavioral Health, Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA.

Funding

Translational Engineering in Cancer (TEC)P30CA023108 · NCI · DARTMOUTH COLLEGE · PI Fred W Kolling IV · 1985 to 2026
$91.3M
AHRQ HHS T32 HS013852NCI NIH HHS P30 CA023108
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesThe clinic visit is a critical point of contact for family caregivers. However, only 37% of family caregivers are able to accompany patients to visits. When they cannot attend, caregivers receive visit information to assist with their caregiving. However, little is known about how method of receiving information from clinic visits is associated with important caregiver outcomes. This study sought to determine whether mode of receiving clinic visit information (speaking with the patient, attending the visit, or using an after-visit summary [AVS]) was associated with changes in caregiver burden, caregiver preparedness, and the positive aspects of caregiving.

methodsCross-sectional web-based survey of a national sample of adult family caregivers. Multiple linear regression models determined associations between communication modes and caregivers' burden, preparedness, and positive aspects of caregiving, adjusting for sociodemographic covariates.

resultsRespondents ( SIGNIFICANCE OF

resultsMethod of communicating visit information is associated with improvements in caregiver preparedness and the positive aspects of caregiving, though caregiver burden may be unaffected by information exchange. Given the limitations of current communication methods, future work should explore directionality of the associations we found and identify visit communication strategies with caregivers that optimize caregiver and patient outcomes.

Indexed as

Health communicationsparental caregivingtriadic communication

Identifiers

PMID38654707
PMCPMC11924104

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.