Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38654693›Full record

SynthesisPublic health nutrition2024

The role of vitamin D in outcomes of critical care in COVID-19 patients: evidence from an umbrella meta-analysis of interventional and observational studies.

Abdolreza Jamilian, Faezeh Ghalichi, Fatemeh Hamedi Kalajahi, Nima Radkhah, Neda Jourabchi, Vali Musazadeh, Ehsan Amini-Salehi, Meysam Zarezadeh, Alireza Ostadrahimi

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Public health nutrition, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Abdolreza JamilianCity of London Dental School, University of Bolton, London, UK.
Faezeh GhalichiStudent Research Committee, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Fatemeh Hamedi KalajahiStudent Research Committee, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Nima RadkhahDepartment of Clinical Nutrition, School of Nutrition and Food Sciences, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.ORCID 0000-0002-9353-8066
Neda JourabchiStudent Research Committee, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Vali MusazadehStudent Research Committee, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Ehsan Amini-SalehiSchool of Medicine, Guilan University of Medical Sciences, Rasht, Iran.
Meysam ZarezadehStudent Research Committee, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
Alireza OstadrahimiNutrition Research Center, School of Nutrition and Food Sciences, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Attar-Neishaburi St., Golgasht Alley, Azadi Blvd., Tabriz, Iran.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesSeveral meta-analyses have suggested the beneficial effect of vitamin D on patients infected with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2. This umbrella meta-analysis aims to evaluate influence of vitamin D supplementation on clinical outcomes and the mortality rate of COVID-19 patients.

designPresent study was designed as an umbrella meta-analysis. The following international databases were systematically searched till March 2023: Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, and Embase. SETTINGS: Random-effects model was employed to perform meta-analysis. Using AMSTAR critical evaluation tools, the methodological quality of the included meta-analyses was evaluated.

participantsAdult patients suffering from COVID-19 were studied.

resultsOverall, 13 meta-analyses summarising data from 4 randomised controlled trial and 9 observational studies were identified in this umbrella review. Our findings revealed that vitamin D supplementation and status significantly reduced mortality of COVID-19 [Interventional studies: (ES = 0·42; 95 % CI: 0·10, 0·75,

conclusionOverall, vitamin D status is a critical factor influencing the mortality rate, disease severity, admission to intensive care unit and being detached from mechanical ventilation. It is vital to monitor the vitamin D status in all patients with critical conditions including COVID patients.

Indexed as

COVID-19Critical CareDietary SupplementsObservational Studies as TopicSARS-CoV-2Vitamin DAdultCOVID-19 Drug TreatmentHumansIntensive Care UnitsRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicVitamin D DeficiencyVitaminsVitamin DVitaminsCOVID-19Critical illnessIntensive care unitMortalityUmbrella meta-analysisVitamin D

Identifiers

PMID38654693
PMCPMC11112434

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.