Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38654647›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2024

A practical guide to cross-cultural and multi-sited data collection in the biological and behavioural sciences.

Laure Spake, Anushé Hassan, Susan B Schaffnit, Nurul Alam, Abena S Amoah, Jainaba Badjie, Carla Cerami, Amelia Crampin, Albert Dube, Miranda P Kaye and 13 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Laure SpakeBinghamton University (SUNY), Binghamton, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-2243-7356
Anushé HassanLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-3649-3049
Susan B SchaffnitPennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
Nurul AlamInternational Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b), Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Abena S AmoahLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Jainaba BadjieMedical Research Council Unit The Gambia at the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine (MRCG@LSHTM), Fajara, The Gambia.
Carla CeramiLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7634-0955
Amelia CrampinInternational Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b), Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Albert DubeMalawi Epidemiology and Intervention Research Unit, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Miranda P KayePennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
Renee KotchPennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
Frankie LiewLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Estelle McLeanLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Shekinah Munthali-MkandawireMalawi Epidemiology and Intervention Research Unit, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Lusako MwalwandaMalawi Epidemiology and Intervention Research Unit, Lilongwe, Malawi.
Anne-Cathrine PetersenUniversity of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.
Andrew M PrenticeLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Fatema Tuz ZohoraInternational Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Bangladesh (icddr,b), Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Joseph WattsUniversity of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Rebecca SearLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4315-0223
Mary K ShenkPennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-2002-1469
Richard SosisUniversity of Connecticut, Storrs, CT, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6838-881X
John H ShaverUniversity of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-9522-4765

Funding

John Templeton Foundation 61425Templeton Religion Trust TRT-2022-30378
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Researchers in the biological and behavioural sciences are increasingly conducting collaborative, multi-sited projects to address how phenomena vary across ecologies. These types of projects, however, pose additional workflow challenges beyond those typically encountered in single-sited projects. Through specific attention to cross-cultural research projects, we highlight four key aspects of multi-sited projects that must be considered during the design phase to ensure success: (1) project and team management; (2) protocol and instrument development; (3) data management and documentation; and (4) equitable and collaborative practices. Our recommendations are supported by examples from our experiences collaborating on the Evolutionary Demography of Religion project, a mixed-methods project collecting data across five countries in collaboration with research partners in each host country. To existing discourse, we contribute new recommendations around team and project management, introduce practical recommendations for exploring the validity of instruments through qualitative techniques during piloting, highlight the importance of good documentation at all steps of the project, and demonstrate how data management workflows can be strengthened through open science practices. While this project was rooted in cross-cultural human behavioural ecology and evolutionary anthropology, lessons learned from this project are applicable to multi-sited research across the biological and behavioural sciences.

Indexed as

Behavioral SciencesData CollectionCross-Cultural ComparisonEcologyHumansResearch Designcross-cultural researchmulti-site researchopen scienceresearch designstudy planningstudy protocol

Identifiers

PMID38654647
PMCPMC11040250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.