Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38654607›Full record

ReviewNursing in critical care2025

Best practices for iatrogenic anaemia prevention in the intensive care unit: Blood-sparing techniques.

Marta Raurell-Torredà, Rafael-Jesús Fernández-Castillo, María-Esther Rodríguez-Delgado, Susana Arias-Rivera, Luis Basco-Prado

Registry-linked trialOpen access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Nursing in critical care, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06478160 (Effectiveness of Closed-blood Sampling Devices in the Adult Critically Ill Patient), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06478160 narecruitingnot on this map

Effectiveness of Closed-blood Sampling Devices in the Adult Critically Ill Patient: Multicenter Randomized Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of BarcelonaRan2024 to 2026Enrolled216ConditionsAcceptability of Health CareArmsClosed-Blood Sampling Devices, Waste discard volume
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Marta Raurell-TorredàDepartament d'Infermeria Fonamental i Clínica, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Rafael-Jesús Fernández-CastilloDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Nursing, Physiotherapy and Podiatry, University of Seville, Seville, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6846-0375
María-Esther Rodríguez-DelgadoUnidad de Cuidados Intensivos, Hospital Universitario Clínico San Cecilio, Granada, Spain.
Susana Arias-RiveraResearch Department, Hospital Universitario de Getafe, Madrid, Spain.
Luis Basco-PradoDepartament d'Infermeria Fonamental i Clínica, Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Universitat de Barcelona · ESHospital Universitario de Getafe · ESHospital Universitario Virgen Macarena · ESInstituto de Investigación Biosanitaria de Granada · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anaemia is a common issue in patients who are admitted to intensive care units and worsens their condition throughout the stay due to the extraction of blood for diagnostic purposes. It is also well-known that an important amount of the carbon dioxide produced by health services is likely attributable to blood donation, testing and manufacture, storage or distribution of blood components. This must be taken into account to perform nursing interventions consistent with the idea of sustainable health care. In this regard, within patient blood management bundles, with the objective of minimizing the use of blood products, it is recommended to use blood-sparing techniques: small volume tubes (SVT) or closed-blood sampling devices (CBSD). Published studies before 2014 (excepting two more recent ones) have shown that by themselves, both techniques reduce drawn volume but do not decrease haemoglobin reduction and/or need of transfusion. Given the lack of cost-effectiveness studies, it may be easier to implement the use of CBSD as it does not require prior consensus on the discard volume or adaptations in the processing of laboratory tests, as is the case with SVT.

Indexed as

AnemiaIatrogenic DiseaseIntensive Care UnitsBlood TransfusionCritical Care NursingHumansPractice Guidelines as Topicanaemia preventionblood‐sparing techniquesclosed blood sampling devicesintensive care nursingsmall volume tubes

Identifiers

PMID38654607
PMCPMC11783340
OpenAlexW4395078009

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.