Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38654485›Full record

ArticleInfluenza and other respiratory viruses2024

Effectiveness of XBB.1.5 Monovalent COVID-19 Vaccines During a Period of XBB.1.5 Dominance in EU/EEA Countries, October to November 2023: A VEBIS-EHR Network Study.

Susana Monge, James Humphreys, Nathalie Nicolay, Toon Braeye, Izaak Van Evercooren, Christian Holm Hansen, Hanne-Dorthe Emborg, Chiara Sacco, Alberto Mateo-Urdiales, Jesús Castilla and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Influenza and other respiratory viruses, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Susana MongeDepartment of Communicable Diseases, National Centre of Epidemiology, Institute of Health Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
James HumphreysEpiconcept, Paris, France.
Nathalie NicolayVaccine Preventable Diseases and Immunisation, European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC), Solna, Sweden.
Toon BraeyeSciensano, Elsene, Belgium.
Izaak Van EvercoorenSciensano, Elsene, Belgium.
Christian Holm HansenDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Prevention, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Hanne-Dorthe EmborgDepartment of Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Prevention, Statens Serum Institut, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Chiara SaccoInfectious Diseases Department, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy.
Alberto Mateo-UrdialesInfectious Diseases Department, Istituto Superiore di Sanità, Rome, Italy.
Jesús CastillaInstituto de Salud Pública de Navarra - IdiSNA, Pamplona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6396-7265
Iván Martínez-BazInstituto de Salud Pública de Navarra - IdiSNA, Pamplona, Spain.
Brechje de GierCenter for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-9067-090X
Susan HahnéCenter for Infectious Disease Control, National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM), Bilthoven, The Netherlands.
Hinta MeijerinkNorwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH), Oslo, Norway.
Anja Bråthen KristoffersenNorwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH), Oslo, Norway.
Ausenda MachadoDepartamento de Epidemiologia, Instituto Nacional de Saúde Doutor Ricardo Jorge, Lisboa, Portugal.
Patricia SoaresDepartamento de Epidemiologia, Instituto Nacional de Saúde Doutor Ricardo Jorge, Lisboa, Portugal.
Anthony NardoneEpiconcept, Paris, France.
Sabrina BacciVaccine Preventable Diseases and Immunisation, European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC), Solna, Sweden.
Esther KisslingEpiconcept, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0001-7188-8404
Baltazar NunesEpiconcept, Paris, France.
VEBIS‐EHR Working Group

Funding

European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control RS/2022/DTS/2410European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control RS/2022/DTS/24104FCT - Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia, I.P. CEECINST/00049/2021/CP2817/CT0001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Using a common protocol across seven countries in the European Union/European Economic Area, we estimated XBB.1.5 monovalent vaccine effectiveness (VE) against COVID-19 hospitalisation and death in booster-eligible ≥ 65-year-olds, during October-November 2023. We linked electronic records to construct retrospective cohorts and used Cox models to estimate adjusted hazard ratios and derive VE. VE for COVID-19 hospitalisation and death was, respectively, 67% (95%CI: 58-74) and 67% (95%CI: 42-81) in 65- to 79-year-olds and 66% (95%CI: 57-73) and 72% (95%CI: 51-85) in ≥ 80-year-olds. Results indicate that periodic vaccination of individuals ≥ 65 years has an ongoing benefit and support current vaccination strategies in the EU/EEA.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesEuropean UnionHospitalizationSARS-CoV-2Vaccine EfficacyAgedAged, 80 and overElectronic Health RecordsEuropeFemaleHumansMaleRetrospective StudiesVaccinationCOVID-19 Vaccinescohort designCOVID‐19electronic health recordshospitalisationmulticountry studySARS‐CoV‐2vaccine effectiveness

Identifiers

PMID38654485
PMCPMC11040092

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.