Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38654305›Full record

ArticlePhilosophy, ethics, and humanities in medicine : PEHM2024

Guidelines for conscientious objection in Spain: a proposal involving prerequisites and protocolized procedure.

Benjamín Herreros, Venktesh R Ramnath, Andrés Santiago-Saez, Tamara Raquel Velasco Sanz, Pilar Pinto Pastor

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Philosophy, ethics, and humanities in medicine : PEHM, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Benjamín HerrerosUniversidad Europea, Madrid, Spain.
Venktesh R RamnathDivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, UC San Diego Health, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Andrés Santiago-SaezServicio Medicina Legal Intrahospitalaria, Clínico San Carlos Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Tamara Raquel Velasco SanzInstituto de Ética Clínica Francisco Vallés, Universidad Europea, Madrid, Spain.
Pilar Pinto PastorInstituto de Ética Clínica Francisco Vallés, Universidad Europea, Madrid, Spain. pilarpinto@ucm.es.ORCID 0000-0003-4967-2177
Universidad Complutense de Madrid · ESUC San Diego Health System · USUniversidad Europea de Madrid · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Healthcare professionals often face ethical conflicts and challenges related to decision-making that have necessitated consideration of the use of conscientious objection (CO). No current guidelines exist within Spain's healthcare system regarding acceptable rationales for CO, the appropriate application of CO, or practical means to support healthcare professionals who wish to become conscientious objectors. As such, a procedural framework is needed that not only assures the appropriate use of CO by healthcare professionals but also demonstrates its ethical validity, legislative compliance through protection of moral freedoms and patients' rights to receive health care. Our proposal consists of prerequisites of eligibility for CO (individual reference, specific clinical context, ethical justification, assurance of non-discrimination, professional consistency, attitude of mutual respect, assurance of patient rights and safety) and a procedural process (notification and preparation, documentation and confidentiality, evaluation of prerequisites, non-abandonment, transparency, allowance for unforeseen objection, compensatory responsibilities, access to guidance and/or consultative advice, and organizational guarantee of professional substitution). We illustrate the real-world utility of the proposed framework through a case discussion in which our guidelines are applied.

Indexed as

Conscientious Refusal to TreatGuidelines as TopicHumansRefusal to TreatSpainClinical ethicsConscientious objectionDecision-makingProfessionalism

Identifiers

PMID38654305
PMCPMC11040888
OpenAlexW4395080992

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.