Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38654297›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2024

When one door closes: a qualitative exploration of women's experiences of access to sexual and reproductive health services during the COVID-19 lockdown in Nigeria.

Babatunde Adelekan, Lanre Ikuteyijo, Erika Goldson, Zubaida Abubakar, Oluwatomi Adepoju, Olaitan Oyedun, Gbenga Adebayo, Andat Dasogot, Ulla Mueller, Adesegun O Fatusi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Babatunde AdelekanUnited Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) Country Office, Abuja, Nigeria.
Lanre IkuteyijoDepartment of Sociology and Anthropology, Faculty of Social Sciences, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-Ife, Nigeria.
Erika GoldsonUnited Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) Country Office, Abuja, Nigeria.
Zubaida AbubakarUnited Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) Country Office, Abuja, Nigeria.
Oluwatomi AdepojuAcademy for Health Development (AHEAD), Ile-Ife, Nigeria.
Olaitan OyedunAcademy for Health Development (AHEAD), Ile-Ife, Nigeria.
Gbenga AdebayoLivinghealth International, Lagos, Nigeria.
Andat DasogotUnited Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) Country Office, Abuja, Nigeria.
Ulla MuellerUnited Nations Population Fund (UNFPA) Country Office, Abuja, Nigeria.
Adesegun O FatusiAcademy for Health Development (AHEAD), Ile-Ife, Nigeria. afatusi@unimed.edu.ng.
Obafemi Awolowo University · NGIntraHealth International · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCOVID-19 pandemic widely disrupted health services provision, especially during the lockdown period, with females disproportionately affected. Very little is known about alternative healthcare sources used by women when access to conventional health services became challenging. This study examined the experiences of women and adolescent girls regarding access to sexual and reproductive health (SRH) services during the COVID-19 lockdown in Nigeria and their choices of alternative healthcare sources.

methodsThe study sites were two northern states, two southern states, and the Federal Capital Territory. Qualitative data were obtained through 10 focus group discussion sessions held with married adolescents, unmarried adolescents, and older women of reproductive age. The data were transcribed verbatim and analysed using a thematic approach and with the aid of Atlas ti software.

resultsWomen reported that access to family planning services was the most affected SRH services during the COVID-19 lockdown. Several barriers to accessing SRH services during COVID-19 lockdown were reported, including restriction of vehicular movement, harassment by law enforcement officers, fear of contracting COVID-19 from health facilities, and fear of undergoing compulsory COVID-19 tests when seeking care in health facilities. In the face of constrained access to SRH services in public sector facilities during the COVID-19 lockdown, women sought care from several alternative sources, mostly locally available and informal services, including medicine vendors, traditional birth attendants, and neighbours with some health experience. Women also widely engaged in self-medication, using both orthodox drugs and non-orthodox preparations like herbs. The lockdown negatively impacted on women's SRH, with increased incidence of sexual- and gender-based violence, unplanned pregnancy resulting from lack of access to contraceptives, and early marriage involving adolescents with unplanned pregnancies.

conclusionCOVID-19 negatively impacted access to SRH services and forced women to utilise mostly informal service outlets and home remedies as alternatives to conventional health services. There is a need to ensure the continuity of essential SRH services during future lockdowns occasioned by disease outbreaks. Also, community systems strengthening that ensures effective community-based health services, empowered community resource persons, and health-literate populations are imperative for overcoming barriers to healthcare access during future lockdowns.

Indexed as

COVID-19Focus GroupsHealth Services AccessibilityQualitative ResearchReproductive Health ServicesAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansMiddle AgedNigeriaQuarantineYoung AdultCOVID-19COVID-19 lockdownHealthcare AccessSexual and Reproductive HealthSexual and Reproductive Health Services

Identifiers

PMID38654297
PMCPMC11040879
OpenAlexW4395049272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.