Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38654267›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2024

Using machine learning to develop a five-item short form of the children's depression inventory.

Shumei Lin, Chengwei Wang, Xiuyu Jiang, Qian Zhang, Dan Luo, Jing Li, Junyi Li, Jiajun Xu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Shumei Lin *College of Psychology, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Chengwei Wang *Department of Integrated Traditional and Western Medicine, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Xiuyu JiangCollege of Psychology, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Qian ZhangCollege of Psychology, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Dan LuoMental Health Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Jing LiMental Health Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China.
Junyi LiCollege of Psychology, Sichuan Normal University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China. junyili@sicnu.edu.cn.
Jiajun XuMental Health Center, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan, China. xujiajun120@126.com.

Funding

Chengdu Municipal Office of Philosophy and Social Science 2022CZ083Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences GJ202011Sichuan Provincial Center for Educational Informationization and Big Data DSJ2022050
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany adolescents experience depression that often goes undetected and untreated. Identifying children and adolescents at a high risk of depression in a timely manner is an urgent concern. While the Children's Depression Inventory (CDI) is widely utilized in China, it lacks a localized revision or simplified version. With its 27 items requiring professional administration, the original CDI proves to be a time-consuming method for predicting children and adolescents with high depression risk. Hence, this study aimed to develop a shortened version of the CDI to predict high depression risk, thereby enhancing the efficiency of prediction and intervention.

methodsInitially, backward elimination is conducted to identify various version of the short-form scales (e.g., three-item and five-item versions). Subsequently, the performance of five machine learning (ML) algorithms on these versions is evaluated using the area under the ROC curve (AUC) to determine the best algorithm. The chosen algorithm is then utilized to model the short-form scales, facilitating the identification of the optimal short-form scale based on predefined evaluation metrics. Following this, evaluation metrics are computed for all potential decision thresholds of the optimal short-form scale, and the threshold value is determined. Finally, the reliability and validity of the optimal short-form scale are assessed using a new sample.

resultsThe study identified a five-item short-form CDI with a decision threshold of 4 as the most appropriate scale considering all assessment indicators. The scale had 81.48% fewer items than the original version, indicating good predictive performance (AUC = 0.81, Accuracy = 0.83, Recall = 0.76, Precision = 0.71). Based on the test of 315 middle school students, the results showed that the five-item CDI had good measurement indexes (Cronbach's alpha = 0.72, criterion-related validity = 0.77).

conclusionsThis five-item short-form CDI is the first shortened and revised version of the CDI in China based on large local data samples.

Indexed as

DepressionMachine LearningAdolescentAlgorithmsChildChinaFemaleHumansMalePsychiatric Status Rating ScalesPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsAdolescentsCDIChildrenDepressionMachine learning

Identifiers

PMID38654267
PMCPMC11041003

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.