Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38654257›Full record

ArticleBMC psychiatry2024

Developing a prediction model to identify people with severe mental illness without regular contact to their GP - a study based on data from the Danish national registers.

Astrid Helene Deleuran Naesager, Sofie Norgil Damgaard, Maarten Pieter Rozing, Volkert Siersma, Anne Møller, Katrine Tranberg

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC psychiatry, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Astrid Helene Deleuran Naesager *Department of Public Health, The Section of General Practice and the Research Unit for General Practice, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Sofie Norgil Damgaard *Department of Public Health, The Section of General Practice and the Research Unit for General Practice, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Maarten Pieter RozingDepartment of Public Health, The Section of General Practice and the Research Unit for General Practice, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. mroz@sund.ku.dk.
Volkert SiersmaDepartment of Public Health, The Section of General Practice and the Research Unit for General Practice, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Anne MøllerDepartment of Public Health, The Section of General Practice and the Research Unit for General Practice, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Katrine TranbergDepartment of Public Health, The Section of General Practice and the Research Unit for General Practice, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
University of Copenhagen · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPeople with severe mental illness (SMI) face a higher risk of premature mortality due to physical morbidity compared to the general population. Establishing regular contact with a general practitioner (GP) can mitigate this risk, yet barriers to healthcare access persist. Population initiatives to overcome these barriers require efficient identification of those persons in need.

objectiveTo develop a predictive model to identify persons with SMI not attending a GP regularly.

methodFor individuals with psychotic disorder, bipolar disorder, or severe depression between 2011 and 2016 (n = 48,804), GP contacts from 2016 to 2018 were retrieved. Two logistic regression models using demographic and clinical data from Danish national registers predicted severe mental illness without GP contact. Model 1 retained significant main effect variables, while Model 2 included significant bivariate interactions. Goodness-of-fit and discriminating ability were evaluated using Hosmer-Lemeshow (HL) test and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), respectively, via cross-validation.

resultsThe simple model retained 11 main effects, while the expanded model included 13 main effects and 10 bivariate interactions after backward elimination. HL tests were non-significant for both models (p = 0.50 for the simple model and p = 0.68 for the extended model). Their respective AUC values were 0.789 and 0.790.

conclusionLeveraging Danish national register data, we developed two predictive models to identify SMI individuals without GP contact. The extended model had slightly better model performance than the simple model. Our study may help to identify persons with SMI not engaging with primary care which could enhance health and treatment outcomes in this group.

Indexed as

Bipolar DisorderPsychotic DisordersRegistriesAdultAgedDenmarkFemaleGeneral PractitionersHealth Services AccessibilityHumansMajor Depressive DisorderMaleMental DisordersMiddle AgedYoung AdultGeneral practitionerHealth careLogistic modelsPatient care continuityROC curveSevere mental disorder

Identifiers

PMID38654257
PMCPMC11040846
OpenAlexW4395049415

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.