Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38654219›Full record

ArticleBMC medical research methodology2024

Evaluation of respondent-driven sampling in seven studies of people who use drugs from rural populations: findings from the Rural Opioid Initiative.

Abby E Rudolph, Robin M Nance, Georgiy Bobashev, Daniel Brook, Wajiha Akhtar, Ryan Cook, Hannah L Cooper, Peter D Friedmann, Simon D W Frost, Vivian F Go and 14 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical research methodology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Correlates of Rural Naloxone Possession Among People Who Use Drugs: A Multi-State Cross-Sectional Analysis.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. "I'm tired of seeing my friends die": Barriers and facilitators to participating in clinical trials among rural people who use drugs in the United States.The Journal of rural health : official journal of the American Rural Health Association and the National Rural Health Care Association · 2025
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 15 institutions in 2 countries.

Abby E RudolphDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Temple University College of Public Health, 1301 Cecil B Moore Avenue, Ritter Annex 905, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Robin M NanceHarborview Medical Center, University of Washington, 325 9th Ave, Box 359931, Seattle, WA, 98106, USA.
Georgiy BobashevRTI International, 3040 East Cornwallis Road, P.O. Box 12194, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709-2194, USA.
Daniel BrookDivision of Epidemiology, College of Public Health, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, 43210, USA.
Wajiha AkhtarUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison, Population Health Institute, 610 Walnut Street, 575 WARF, Madison, WI, 53726, USA.
Ryan CookGeneral Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR, 97239-3098, USA.
Hannah L CooperRollins School of Public Health, Emory University, Grace Crum Rollins Building, 1518 Clifton Road, Atlanta, Georgia, 30322, USA.
Peter D FriedmannBaystate Medical Center-University of Massachusetts, Office of Research, UMass Chan Medical School - Baystate, 3601 Main Street, 3rd Floor, Springfield, MA, 01199, USA.
Simon D W FrostMicrosoft Premonition, Microsoft Building 99, 14820 NE 36th St. Redmond, Seattle, WA, 98052, USA.
Vivian F GoUniversity of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, 363 Rosenau Hall, CB# 7440, Chapel Hill, NC, 27599, USA.
Wiley D JenkinsSouthern Illinois University, 201 E Madison Street, Springfield, IL, 62702, USA.
Philip T KorthuisOregon Health & Science University, 3270 Southwest Pavilion Loop OHSU Physicians Pavilion, Suite 350, Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
William C MillerThe Ohio State University, 302 Cunz Hall, 1841 Neil Ave, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
Mai T PhoUniversity of Chicago, 5841 S. Maryland Avenue, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.
Stephanie A RudermanHarborview Medical Center, University of Washington, 325 9th Ave, Box 359931, Seattle, WA, 98106, USA.
David W SealTulane University, 1440 Canal Street, Suite 2210, New Orleans, LA, 70112, USA.
Thomas J StopkaTufts University School of Medicine, Public Health and Community Medicine, 136 Harrison Avenue, Boston, MA, 02111, USA.
Ryan P WestergaardUniversity of Wisconsin-Madison, 1685 Highland Avenue, 5th Floor, Madison, WI, 53705-2281, USA.
April M YoungUniversity of Kentucky, 760 Press Avenue, Suite 280, Lexington, KY, 40536, USA.
William A ZuleRTI International, 3040 East Cornwallis Road, P.O. Box 12194, Research Triangle Park, NC, 27709-2194, USA.
Judith I TsuiHarborview Medical Center, University of Washington, 325 9th Ave, Box 359931, Seattle, WA, 98106, USA.
Heidi M CraneHarborview Medical Center, University of Washington, 325 9th Ave, Box 359931, Seattle, WA, 98106, USA. hcrane@uw.edu.
Bridget M WhitneyHarborview Medical Center, University of Washington, 325 9th Ave, Box 359931, Seattle, WA, 98106, USA.
Joseph A C DelaneyHarborview Medical Center, University of Washington and University of Manitoba, University of Washington, 325 9th Ave, Box 359931, Seattle, WA, 98106, USA.
University of Washington · USOregon Health & Science University · USRTI International · USThe Ohio State University · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · USBaystate Medical Center · USEmory University · USSouthern Illinois University School of Medicine · USTemple University · USTufts University · USTulane University · USUniversity of Chicago · USUniversity of Kentucky · USUniversity of London · GBUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

Kentucky Communities and Researchers Engaging to Halt the Opioid Epidemic (CARE2HOPE)UH3DA044798 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI COOPER, HANNAH LF, YOUNG, APRIL MARIE · 2019 to 2022
$4.4M
Rural Comorbidity and HIV consequences of Opioid use Research and Treatment Initiative (Rural cohort)U24DA048538 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI CRANE, HEIDI M., TSUI, JUDITH · 2019 to 2023
$3.7M
Drug Injection Surveillance and Care Enhancement for Rural Northern New England (DISCERNNE)UG3DA044830 · NIDA · BAYSTATE MEDICAL CENTER, INC. · PI FRIEDMANN, PETER D · 2017 to 2018
$1.6M
Community-based, client-centered prevention homes to address the rural opioid epidemicUG3DA044826 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI SEAL, DAVID W, WESTERGAARD, RYAN PATRICK · 2017 to 2018
$1.4M
Kentucky Communities & Researchers Engaging to Halt the Opioid Epidemic-CARE2HOPEUG3DA044798 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI COOPER, HANNAH LF, YOUNG, APRIL MARIE · 2017 to 2018
$1.3M
Mitigating the Outcomes Associated with the Injection Drug Use Epidemic in Southern AppalachiaUG3DA044823 · NIDA · RESEARCH TRIANGLE INSTITUTE · PI ZULE, WILLIAM A · 2017 to 2018
$1.2M
Implementing a Community-Based Response to the Opioid Epidemic in Rural OhioUG3DA044822 · NIDA · OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI GO, VIVIAN F., MILLER, WILLIAM C · 2017 to 2018
$1.1M
Ending transmission of HIV, HCV, and STDs and overdose in rural communities of people who inject drugs (ETHIC)UG3DA044829 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI JENKINS, WILEY, PHO, MAI TUYET · 2017 to 2018
$1.1M
Oregon HIV/Hepatitis and Opioid Prevention and Engagement (OR-HOPE) StudyUG3DA044831 · NIDA · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI KORTHUIS, PHILIP TODD · 2017 to 2018
$895k
Transporting treatment effects from clinical trials to real-world populations with co-occurring opioid and stimulant use disordersK01DA055130 · NIDA · OREGON HEALTH & SCIENCE UNIVERSITY · PI COOK, RYAN · 2022 to 2025
$714k
NIDA NIH HHS K01 DA055130NIDA NIH HHS U24 DA048538NIDA NIH HHS U24DA048538NIDA NIH HHS UG3 DA044798NIDA NIH HHS UG3DA044798NIDA NIH HHS UG3 DA044822NIDA NIH HHS UG3DA044822NIDA NIH HHS UG3 DA044823NIDA NIH HHS UG3DA044823NIDA NIH HHS UG3 DA044826NIDA NIH HHS UG3DA044826NIDA NIH HHS UG3 DA044829NIDA NIH HHS UG3DA044829NIDA NIH HHS UG3 DA044830NIDA NIH HHS UG3DA044830NIDA NIH HHS UG3 DA044831NIDA NIH HHS UG3DA044831NIDA NIH HHS UH3 DA044798
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAccurate prevalence estimates of drug use and its harms are important to characterize burden and develop interventions to reduce negative health outcomes and disparities. Lack of a sampling frame for marginalized/stigmatized populations, including persons who use drugs (PWUD) in rural settings, makes this challenging. Respondent-driven sampling (RDS) is frequently used to recruit PWUD. However, the validity of RDS-generated population-level prevalence estimates relies on assumptions that should be evaluated.

methodsRDS was used to recruit PWUD across seven Rural Opioid Initiative studies between 2018-2020. To evaluate RDS assumptions, we computed recruitment homophily and design effects, generated convergence and bottleneck plots, and tested for recruitment and degree differences. We compared sample proportions with three RDS-adjusted estimators (two variations of RDS-I and RDS-II) for five variables of interest (past 30-day use of heroin, fentanyl, and methamphetamine; past 6-month homelessness; and being positive for hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody) using linear regression with robust confidence intervals. We compared regression estimates for the associations between HCV positive antibody status and (a) heroin use, (b) fentanyl use, and (c) age using RDS-1 and RDS-II probability weights and no weights using logistic and modified Poisson regression and random-effects meta-analyses.

resultsAmong 2,842 PWUD, median age was 34 years and 43% were female. Most participants (54%) reported opioids as their drug of choice, however regional differences were present (e.g., methamphetamine range: 4-52%). Many recruitment chains were not long enough to achieve sample equilibrium. Recruitment homophily was present for some variables. Differences with respect to recruitment and degree varied across studies. Prevalence estimates varied only slightly with different RDS weighting approaches, most confidence intervals overlapped. Variations in measures of association varied little based on weighting approach.

conclusionsRDS was a useful recruitment tool for PWUD in rural settings. However, several violations of key RDS assumptions were observed which slightly impacts estimation of proportion although not associations.

Indexed as

Rural PopulationAdultDrug UsersFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedOpioid-Related DisordersPatient SelectionPrevalenceSampling StudiesSubstance-Related DisordersDrug useMethamphetamineOpioidsRespondent-driven samplingRural health

Identifiers

PMID38654219
PMCPMC11036624
OpenAlexW4395046127

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.