ArticleBMC medical imaging2024
Imaging segmentation mechanism for rectal tumors using improved U-Net.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- A Fixed-Ratio Hybrid ARO-ALO Algorithm for Multi-Level Thresholding of Histopathological Colon Cancer Images.Cancers · 2026Article
- Article
- Deep Learning for Automated Tumor Segmentation of Rectal Cancer on T2-Weighted Magnetic Resonance Images.Yonsei medical journal · 2026Article
- Rectal cancer segmentation via HHF-SAM: a hierarchical hypercolumn-guided fusion segment anything model.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveIn radiation therapy, cancerous region segmentation in magnetic resonance images (MRI) is a critical step. For rectal cancer, the automatic segmentation of rectal tumors from an MRI is a great challenge. There are two main shortcomings in existing deep learning-based methods that lead to incorrect segmentation: 1) there are many organs surrounding the rectum, and the shape of some organs is similar to that of rectal tumors; 2) high-level features extracted by conventional neural networks often do not contain enough high-resolution information. Therefore, an improved U-Net segmentation network based on attention mechanisms is proposed to replace the traditional U-Net network.
methodsThe overall framework of the proposed method is based on traditional U-Net. A ResNeSt module was added to extract the overall features, and a shape module was added after the encoder layer. We then combined the outputs of the shape module and the decoder to obtain the results. Moreover, the model used different types of attention mechanisms, so that the network learned information to improve segmentation accuracy.
resultsWe validated the effectiveness of the proposed method using 3773 2D MRI datasets from 304 patients. The results showed that the proposed method achieved 0.987, 0.946, 0.897, and 0.899 for Dice, MPA, MioU, and FWIoU, respectively; these values are significantly better than those of other existing methods.
conclusionDue to time savings, the proposed method can help radiologists segment rectal tumors effectively and enable them to focus on patients whose cancerous regions are difficult for the network to segment. SIGNIFICANCE: The proposed method can help doctors segment rectal tumors, thereby ensuring good diagnostic quality and accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.