Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38654135›Full record

ReviewNature protocols2024

Surface photovoltage microscopy for mapping charge separation on photocatalyst particles.

Ruotian Chen, Chenwei Ni, Jian Zhu, Fengtao Fan, Can Li

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature protocols, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
13.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Near-infrared-active Nd-BiONature communications · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Probing charge-transfer processes in Pt/TiOProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. In Situ Imaging Reveals Efficient Charge Separation in Monolayer MoSJournal of the American Chemical Society · 2026
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Calcined Xerogels of C/TiOGels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  13. Light-induced CoONature communications · 2025
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. National science review · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ruotian ChenState Key Laboratory of Catalysis, Dalian National Laboratory for Clean Energy, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Dalian, China. rtchen@dicp.ac.cn.
Chenwei NiState Key Laboratory of Catalysis, Dalian National Laboratory for Clean Energy, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Dalian, China.
Jian ZhuState Key Laboratory of Catalysis, Dalian National Laboratory for Clean Energy, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Dalian, China.
Fengtao FanState Key Laboratory of Catalysis, Dalian National Laboratory for Clean Energy, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Dalian, China. ftfan@dicp.ac.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-9828-6988
Can LiState Key Laboratory of Catalysis, Dalian National Laboratory for Clean Energy, Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Dalian, China. canli@dicp.ac.cn.ORCID 0000-0002-9301-7850
Dalian Institute of Chemical Physics · CNDalian National Laboratory for Clean Energy · CN

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 22088102National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 22102173National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 22325205National Natural Science Foundation of China (National Science Foundation of China) 22372159
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Solar-driven photocatalytic reactions offer a promising route to clean and sustainable energy, and the spatial separation of photogenerated charges on the photocatalyst surface is the key to determining photocatalytic efficiency. However, probing the charge-separation properties of photocatalysts is a formidable challenge because of the spatially heterogeneous microstructures, complicated charge-separation mechanisms and lack of sensitivity for detecting the low density of separated photogenerated charges. Recently, we developed surface photovoltage microscopy (SPVM) with high spatial and energy resolution that enables the direct mapping of surface-charge distributions and quantitative assessment of the charge-separation properties of photocatalysts at the nanoscale, potentially providing unprecedented insights into photocatalytic charge-separation processes. Here, this protocol presents detailed procedures that enable researchers to construct the SPVM instruments by integrating Kelvin probe force microscopy with an illumination system and the modulated surface photovoltage (SPV) approach. It then describes in detail how to perform SPVM measurements on actual photocatalyst particles, including sample preparation, tuning of the microscope, adjustment of the illuminated light path, acquisition of SPVM images and measurements of spatially resolved modulated SPV signals. Moreover, the protocol also includes sophisticated data analysis that can guide non-experts in understanding the microscopic charge-separation mechanisms. The measurements are ordinarily performed on photocatalysts with a conducting substrate in gases or vacuum and can be completed in 15 h.

Indexed as

MicroscopyCatalysisPhotochemical ProcessesSurface Properties

Identifiers

PMID38654135
OpenAlexW4395037676

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.