ArticleScientific reports2024
A dense matching method for remote sensing images fused with CPS denoising.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Dense matching of remote sensing images is crucial for 3D reconstruction. This study proposes an enhanced dense matching method employing the CPS image denoising algorithm, aiming to boost the SGM algorithm's accuracy and efficiency in remote sensing image matching. The stereo image pair's quality is evaluated using the PSNR index, and a decision-making criterion based on the CPS algorithm is incorporated to determine the need for denoising. Preprocessing steps, including image cropping and pixel coordinate transformation, significantly reduce computational requirements. An epipolar line model, minimizing the disparity between two pixels, is used for calculations. This model is employed to construct an epipolar image, enhancing the accuracy and efficiency of the process. The study conducted experimental validation and analysis of the mismatch rate, running time, and denoising effect of the algorithm using the Middlebury 2021 stereo datasets. Additionally, the matching results of the World-View3 satellite stereo image pairs were visualized and analyzed. The experimental results indicate that the proposed algorithm reduces the average mismatch rate by 13.1% and increases the running speed by about 3 to 4 times compared to the SGBM algorithm. Specifically, the denoising effect reduces the mismatch rate of the reconstructed image by an average of 8.97%. The results indicate that the CPS method effectively addresses dense matching challenges in the presence of image blur and noise, thereby improving the operational efficiency and accuracy of the dense matching algorithm.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.