Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38653993›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Two-view topogram-based anatomy-guided CT reconstruction for prospective risk minimization.

Chang Liu, Laura Klein, Yixing Huang, Edith Baader, Michael Lell, Marc Kachelrieß, Andreas Maier

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Chang LiuPattern Recognition Lab, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany. chang.ch.liu@fau.de.
Laura KleinDivision of X-Ray Imaging and Computed Tomography, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Yixing HuangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.
Edith BaaderDivision of X-Ray Imaging and Computed Tomography, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Michael LellDepartment of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum Nürnberg, Paracelsus Medical University, Nuremberg, Germany.
Marc KachelrießDivision of X-Ray Imaging and Computed Tomography, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Andreas MaierPattern Recognition Lab, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg (FAU), Erlangen, Germany.

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft KA 1678/24
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To facilitate a prospective estimation of the effective dose of an CT scan prior to the actual scanning in order to use sophisticated patient risk minimizing methods, a prospective spatial dose estimation and the known anatomical structures are required. To this end, a CT reconstruction method is required to reconstruct CT volumes from as few projections as possible, i.e. by using the topograms, with anatomical structures as correct as possible. In this work, an optimized CT reconstruction model based on a generative adversarial network (GAN) is proposed. The GAN is trained to reconstruct 3D volumes from an anterior-posterior and a lateral CT projection. To enhance anatomical structures, a pre-trained organ segmentation network and the 3D perceptual loss are applied during the training phase, so that the model can then generate both organ-enhanced CT volume and organ segmentation masks. The proposed method can reconstruct CT volumes with PSNR of 26.49, RMSE of 196.17, and SSIM of 0.64, compared to 26.21, 201.55 and 0.63 using the baseline method. In terms of the anatomical structure, the proposed method effectively enhances the organ shapes and boundaries and allows for a straight-forward identification of the relevant anatomical structures. We note that conventional reconstruction metrics fail to indicate the enhancement of anatomical structures. In addition to such metrics, the evaluation is expanded with assessing the organ segmentation performance. The average organ dice of the proposed method is 0.71 compared with 0.63 for the baseline model, indicating the enhancement of anatomical structures.

Indexed as

Tomography, X-Ray ComputedAlgorithmsHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedImaging, Three-DimensionalPhantoms, ImagingProspective StudiesRadiation DosageCTTwo-view reconstruction

Identifiers

PMID38653993
PMCPMC11039459

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.