Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38653950›Full record

SynthesisTherapeutic innovation & regulatory science2024

Unlocking the Potential: A Systematic Review of Master Protocol in Pediatrics.

Yimei Li, Robert Nelson, Rima Izem, Kristine Broglio, Rajiv Mundayat, Margaret Gamalo, Yansong Wen, Haitao Pan, Hengrui Sun, Jingjing Ye

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Therapeutic innovation & regulatory science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Yimei LiDepartment of Biostatistics, Epidemiology and Informatics, University of Pennsylvania, 3501 Civic Center Blvd, Colket Translational Research Building Room 4032, 19034, Philadelphia, PA, USA. liy3@chop.edu.ORCID 0000-0001-9067-6992
Robert NelsonJohnson & Johnson, Spring House, PA, USA.
Rima IzemStatistical Methodology, Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
Kristine BroglioAstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD, USA.
Rajiv MundayatPfizer, New York, NY, USA.
Margaret GamaloPfizer, New York, NY, USA.
Yansong WenDivision of Oncology, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Haitao PanDepartment of Biostatistics, St. Jude Children's Hospital, Memphis, TN, USA.
Hengrui SunFood & Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
Jingjing YeBeiGene, Cambridge, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The use of master protocols allows for innovative approaches to clinical trial designs, potentially enabling new approaches to operations and analytics and creating value for patients and drug developers. Pediatric research has been conducted for many decades, but the use of novel designs such as master protocols in pediatric research is not well understood. This study aims to provide a systematic review on the utilization of master protocols in pediatric drug development. A search was performed in September 2022 using two data sources (PubMed and ClinicalTrials.gov) and included studies conducted in the past10 years. General study information was extracted such as study type, study status, therapeutic area, and clinical trial phase. Study characteristics that are specific to pediatric studies (such as age of the participants and pediatric drug dosing) and important study design elements (such as number of test drug arms and whether randomization and/or concurrent control was used) were also collected. Our results suggest that master protocol studies are being used in pediatrics, with platform and basket trials more common than umbrella trials. Most of this experience is in oncology and early phase studies. There is a rise in the use starting in 2020, largely in oncology and COVID-19 trials. However, adoption of master protocols in pediatric clinical research is still on a small scale and could be substantially expanded. Work is required to further understand the barriers in implementing pediatric master protocols, from setting up infrastructure to interpreting study findings.

Indexed as

PediatricsResearch DesignAdaptive Clinical Trials as TopicChildClinical Trials as TopicCOVID-19Drug DevelopmentHumansBasket trialsMaster protocolPediatricPlatform trialSystematic reviewUmbrella trial

Identifiers

PMID38653950
PMCPMC11169036

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.