Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38653854›Full record

ArticleRadiologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2024

[Pediatric developmental disorders of the musculoskeletal system].

Marc Steinborn

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Marc SteinbornInstitut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie und Kinderradiologie, München Klinik Schwabing, München, Deutschland. Marc.Steinborn@muenchen-klinik.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

clinical/methodical issueIn pediatric musculoskeletal disorders, a distinction is made between normal and abnormal development. STANDARD RADIOLOGICAL

methodsX‑ray examination is the standard diagnostic procedure. METHODOLOGICAL INNOVATIONS: Cross-sectional imaging, such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), and ultrasonography (US) are increasingly used. PERFORMANCE: X‑ray imaging is still the examination method of choice but can be supplemented by cross-sectional imaging depending on clinical situation. ACHIEVEMENTS: Cross-sectional imaging is helpful and necessary in many cases but significantly more time-consuming and costly than x‑ray examinations. PRACTICAL RECOMMENDATIONS: Initially standard x‑rays should be taken, which can then be supplemented with cross-sectional imaging depending on the result and clinical question (MRI and US are preferred as there is no radiation).

Indexed as

Musculoskeletal DiseasesChildChild, PreschoolFemaleHumansInfantInfant, NewbornMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleTomography, X-Ray ComputedUltrasonographyALARA principleChildrenDiagnostic x‑raysGrowthMusculoskeletal diseases

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.