Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38653840›Full record

ArticleBioprocess and biosystems engineering2024

Impact of fed-batch process intensification on the productivity and product quality of two CHO cell lines expressing unique novel molecular format proteins.

Nicolas Q Wolnick, Marissa R Dickson, Thaddaeus A Webster, Roger P Connolly, Nancy Fernandes, Vesela Encheva, Hunter Crittenden, Jessica Hodgkins, Brian C Hadley, Gabriella Palermo and 7 more

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bioprocess and biosystems engineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Nicolas Q WolnickResearch and Development, Lonza Biologics, Bend, OR, USA. nicolas.wolnick@lonza.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9033-5389
Marissa R DicksonResearch and Development, Lonza Biologics, Portsmouth, NH, USA. marissa.dickson@lonza.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-3062-2923
Thaddaeus A WebsterResearch and Development, Lonza Biologics, Portsmouth, NH, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2923-4711
Roger P ConnollyResearch and Development, Lonza Biologics, Portsmouth, NH, USA.
Nancy FernandesResearch and Development, Lonza Biologics, Portsmouth, NH, USA.
Vesela EnchevaResearch and Development, Lonza Biologics, Slough, UK.
Hunter CrittendenResearch and Development, Lonza Biologics, Bend, OR, USA.
Jessica HodgkinsResearch and Development, Lonza Biologics, Portsmouth, NH, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-3398-388X
Brian C HadleyResearch and Development, Lonza Biologics, Portsmouth, NH, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4443-181X
Gabriella PalermoResearch and Development, Lonza Biologics, Portsmouth, NH, USA.
Shannon J HendrickResearch and Development, Lonza Biologics, Bend, OR, USA.
Roy A NewellResearch and Development, Lonza Biologics, Portsmouth, NH, USA.
Genevieve GrayResearch and Development, Lonza Biologics, Portsmouth, NH, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-4348-5083
Christian SiltanenResearch and Development, Lonza Biologics, Bend, OR, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5216-3512
Julia ArmstrongResearch and Development, Lonza Biologics, Bend, OR, USA.
Brandon J DowneyResearch and Development, Lonza Biologics, Bend, OR, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1676-1926
Carrie MasonResearch and Development, Lonza Biologics, Portsmouth, NH, USA.
Lonza (United States) · USLonza (United Kingdom) · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

While monospecific antibodies have long been the foundational offering of protein therapeutics, recent advancements in antibody engineering have allowed for the development of far more complex antibody structures. Novel molecular format (NMF) proteins, such as bispecific antibodies (BsAbs), are structures capable of multispecific binding, allowing for expanded therapeutic functionality. As demand for NMF proteins continues to rise, biomanufacturers face the challenge of increasing bioreactor process productivity while simultaneously maintaining consistent product quality. This challenge is exacerbated when producing structurally complex proteins with asymmetric modalities, as seen in NMFs. In this study, the impact of a high inoculation density (HID) fed-batch process on the productivity and product quality attributes of two CHO cell lines expressing unique NMFs, a monospecific antibody with an Fc-fusion protein and a bispecific antibody, compared to low inoculation density (LID) platform fed-batch processes was evaluated. It was observed that an intensified platform fed-batch process increased product concentrations by 33 and 109% for the two uniquely structured complex proteins in a shorter culture duration while maintaining similar product quality attributes to traditional fed-batch processes.

Indexed as

BioreactorsCricetulusAnimalsAntibodies, BispecificBatch Cell Culture TechniquesCHO CellsCricetinaeRecombinant ProteinsAntibodies, BispecificRecombinant ProteinsBiomanufacturingBispecific antibody (BsAb)Fc-fusion antibodyHigh inoculation density (HID)Novel molecular format (NMF)Process intensification

Identifiers

PMID38653840
PMCPMC11269418
OpenAlexW4395050953

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.