Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38653837›Full record

Trial reportArchives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery2024

Performance of medial pivot, posterior stabilized and rotating platform total knee arthroplasty based on anteroposterior stability and patient-reported outcome measures; a multicentre double-blinded randomized controlled trial of 210 knees.

J D De Groot, R B G Brokelman, P G Lammers, G M J Van Stralen, C M Kooijman, S T Hokwerda

Erratum issuedAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialMulticenter Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Archives of orthopaedic and trauma surgery, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Medial pivot total knee arthroplasty.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2025
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

J D De GrootDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, OCON, Geerdinksweg 141, Hengelo, 7555 DL, The Netherlands. jd.de.groot@outlook.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0006-8486-8131
R B G BrokelmanDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, OCON, Geerdinksweg 141, Hengelo, 7555 DL, The Netherlands.
P G LammersDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, St. Jansdal, Wethouder Jansenlaan 90, Harderwijk, 3844 DG, The Netherlands.
G M J Van StralenDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nij Smellinghe, Compagnonsplein 1, Drachten, 9202 NN, The Netherlands.
C M KooijmanDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Nij Smellinghe, Compagnonsplein 1, Drachten, 9202 NN, The Netherlands.
S T HokwerdaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Antonius, Bolwarderbaan 1, Sneek, 8601 ZK, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDespite advancements in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), 10-20% of patients remain dissatisfied after surgery. Improved anteroposterior (AP) stability provided by medial pivot (MP) implants may theoretically lead to higher patient satisfaction.

methodsAP stability and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) at one-year postsurgery were compared between patients who underwent TKA with MP- (n = 121), posterior stabilized (PS; n = 53) and rotating platform (RP; n = 57) implants in a double-blind multicentre randomized controlled trial (Dutch Trial Register: NL6856, 21-02-2018). AP stability was assessed at 30°, 60° and 90° of knee flexion using a KT-2000 arthrometer. PROMs were measured preoperative and one-year postsurgery.

resultsMP-TKA provided significant better AP stability at early flexion (30°) compared to PS- and RP-TKA (median [IQR]; 1.79 [1.14-2.77] mm vs. 3.31 [2.51-4.08] mm vs. 2.82 [1.80-4.03] mm, p < 0.001). Additionally, MP-TKA provided significant better AP stability at mid-flexion (60°) compared to PS-TKA (1.75 [1.23-2.36] mm vs. 2.14 [1.49-2.83] mm, p = 0.014). PROM improvements were comparable between implant designs. AP laxity of ≥ 4 mm at early flexion was independently of implant design associated with significantly worse Kujala scores. The incidence of ≥ 4 mm AP laxity at any knee angle was however not significantly different between implant designs.

conclusionMP-, PS- and RP-TKA all provide excellent and comparable results. Although MP-TKA provided better AP stability at early flexion compared to PS- and RP-TKA, this was found to be unrelated to improved PROMs in favour of MP-TKA. More studies focusing on early and mid-flexion performance based differences between MP and other TKA designs are required to confirm our findings. Other non-implant related factors may play a more important role in the performance of TKA and are potentially worthwhile examining.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, Replacement, KneeKnee ProsthesisPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresAgedDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansJoint InstabilityKnee JointMaleMiddle AgedPatient SatisfactionProsthesis DesignRange of Motion, ArticularAnteroposterior stabilityMedial pivotPatient related outcome measurementsPosterior stabilizedRotating platformTotal knee arthroplasty

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.