Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38653772›Full record

ArticleNature communications2024

Physiography, foraging mobility, and the first peopling of Sahul.

Tristan Salles, Renaud Joannes-Boyau, Ian Moffat, Laurent Husson, Manon Lorcery

Abstract readHistorical Article
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Tristan SallesSchool of Geosciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia. tristan.salles@sydney.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6095-7689
Renaud Joannes-BoyauGeoarchaeology and Archaeometry Research Group, Southern Cross University, Lismore, NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0452-486X
Ian MoffatGeoarchaeology and Archaeometry Research Group, Southern Cross University, Lismore, NSW, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2171-7145
Laurent HussonISTerre, CNRS, Université Grenoble-Alpes, Grenoble, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9585-9074
Manon LorcerySchool of Geosciences, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.

Funding

Department of Education and Training | Australian Research Council (ARC) DP220100195Department of Education and Training | Australian Research Council (ARC) FT220100184Department of Education and Training | Australian Research Council (ARC) IC190100031
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The route and speed of migration into Sahul by Homo sapiens remain a major research question in archaeology. Here, we introduce an approach which models the impact of the physical environment on human mobility by combining time-evolving landscapes with Lévy walk foraging patterns, this latter accounting for a combination of short-distance steps and occasional longer moves that hunter-gatherers likely utilised for efficient exploration of new environments. Our results suggest a wave of dispersal radiating across Sahul following riverine corridors and coastlines. Estimated migration speeds, based on archaeological sites and predicted travelled distances, fall within previously reported range from Sahul and other regions. From our mechanistic movement simulations, we then analyse the likelihood of archaeological sites and highlight areas in Australia that hold archaeological potential. Our approach complements existing methods and provides interesting perspectives on the Pleistocene archaeology of Sahul that could be applied to other regions around the world.

Indexed as

ArchaeologyHuman MigrationAustraliaFeeding BehaviorGeographyHistory, AncientHumans

Identifiers

PMID38653772
PMCPMC11039755

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.