Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38653508›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2024

Epirubicin for the Treatment of Sepsis and Septic Shock (EPOS-1): study protocol for a randomised, placebo-controlled phase IIa dose-escalation trial.

Daniel Thomas-Rüddel, Michael Bauer, Luís Ferreira Moita, Christiane Helbig, Peter Schlattmann, Johannes Ehler, Tim Rahmel, Patrick Meybohm, Matthias Gründling, Heiko Schenk and 7 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05033808 (Epirubicin for the Treatment of Sepsis & Septic Shock), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 39% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05033808 phase2unknown statusnot on this map

Epirubicin for the Treatment of Sepsis & Septic Shock

TypeinterventionalSponsorJena University HospitalRan2022 to 2024Enrolled45ConditionsSepsisArmsEpirubicin, Placebo
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 9 institutions in 5 countries.

Daniel Thomas-RüddelDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University, Jena, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-9143-8566
Michael BauerDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University, Jena, Germany.
Luís Ferreira MoitaInstituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, Oeiras, Portugal.
Christiane HelbigCenter for Clinical Studies, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University, Jena, Germany.
Peter SchlattmannInstitute of Medical Statistics, Computer Sciences, and Data Science, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University, Jena, Germany.
Johannes EhlerDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University, Jena, Germany.
Tim RahmelClinic for Anesthesiology, Intensive Care and Pain Therapy, University Medical Center Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum, Bochum, Germany.
Patrick MeybohmDepartment of Anaesthesiology, Intensive Care, Emergency and Pain Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Matthias GründlingDepartment of Anesthesiology, Greifswald, University Hospital of Greifswald, Greifswald, Germany.
Heiko SchenkDepartment of Nephrology and Hypertension, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Thomas KöcherVienna BioCenter Core Facilities GmbH, Wien, Austria.
Frank M BrunkhorstDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University, Jena, Germany.
Markus GrälerDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University, Jena, Germany.
Ann-Julika HegerCenter for Clinical Studies, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University, Jena, Germany.
Sebastian WeisDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Jena University Hospital, Friedrich-Schiller-University, Jena, Germany sebastian.weis@med.uni-jena.de.ORCID 0000-0003-3201-2375
EPOS-1 study group
SepNetCriticalCare TrialsGroup
Jena University Hospital · DECenter for Clinical Studies · USBiology of Infection · FRInstituto Gulbenkian de Ciência · PTMedizinische Hochschule Hannover · DEUniversitätsklinikum Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum · DEUniversitätsklinikum Würzburg · DEUniversitätsmedizin Greifswald · DEVienna Biocenter · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionSepsis remains the major cause of death among hospitalised patients in intensive care. While targeting sepsis-causing pathogens with source control or antimicrobials has had a dramatic impact on morbidity and mortality of sepsis patients, this strategy remains insufficient for about one-third of the affected individuals who succumb. Pharmacological targeting of mechanisms that reduce sepsis-defining organ dysfunction may be beneficial. When given at low doses, the anthracycline epirubicin promotes tissue damage control and lessens the severity of sepsis independently of the host-pathogen load by conferring disease tolerance to infection. Since epirubicin at higher doses can be myelotoxic, a first dose-response trial is necessary to assess the potential harm of this drug in this new indication. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Epirubicin for the Treatment of Sepsis and Septic Shock-1 is a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 dose-escalation phase IIa clinical trial to assess the safety of epirubicin as an adjunctive in patients with sepsis. The primary endpoint is the 14-day myelotoxicity. Secondary and explorative outcomes include 30-day and 90-day mortality, organ dysfunction, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) and cytokine release. Patients will be randomised in three consecutive phases. For each study phase, patients are randomised to one of the two study arms (epirubicin or placebo) in a 4:1 ratio. Approximately 45 patients will be recruited. Patients in the epirubicin group will receive a single dose of epirubicin (3.75, 7.5 or 15 mg/m ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The protocol is approved by the German Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices. The results will be submitted for publication in peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT05033808.

Indexed as

EpirubicinSepsisShock, SepticAdultClinical Trials, Phase II as TopicDose-Response Relationship, DrugDouble-Blind MethodFemaleHumansMaleRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicEpirubicinCHEMOTHERAPYINFECTIOUS DISEASESINTENSIVE & CRITICAL CARE

Identifiers

PMID38653508
PMCPMC11043739
OpenAlexW4395052377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.