ArticleCurrent biology : CB2024
Evolutionary neurogenomics: Lengthy resolutions for complex brains.
Article in Current biology : CB, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The ancient dialogue between brain and body.Current biology : CB · 2025Article
- Functional evolution and functional biodiversity: 150 years ofFrontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Genomic blueprints underlying unique neuronal organization are enigmatic. A new study reveals the recruitment of ancient, larger genes for synaptic machinery, providing evolutionary constraints and flexibility, with increasing gene sizes being found in animal lineages that led to cephalopods and vertebrates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.