Evidence map›Paper›PMID 38653033›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990)2024

Validation of the Lung Immune Prognostic Index (LIPI) as a prognostic biomarker in metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Lucia Carril-Ajuria, Pernelle Lavaud, Cecile Dalban, Sylvie Negrier, Gwénaëlle Gravis, Robert J Motzer, Christine Chevreau, Nizar M Tannir, Stéphane Oudard, David F McDermott and 12 more

Open access · greenAbstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of cancer (Oxford, England : 1990), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Prognostic Value of the Lung Immune Prognostic Index in Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated With Second-Line Immunotherapy.International journal of urology : official journal of the Japanese Urological Association · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 17 institutions in 3 countries.

Lucia Carril-AjuriaGustave Roussy, Villejuif, France. Electronic address: carrilajuria.lucia@gmail.com.
Pernelle LavaudGustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Cecile DalbanDepartment of Biostatistics, Centre Leon Bernard, Lyon, France.
Sylvie NegrierUniversité de Lyon, Centre Leon Bernard, Lyon, France.
Gwénaëlle GravisInstitut Paoli-Calmettes, Aix-Marseille, France.
Robert J MotzerMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Christine ChevreauInstitut Universitaire du Cancer Toulouse-Oncopole, Toulouse, France.
Nizar M TannirUniversity of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA.
Stéphane OudardHôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Oncology department, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Université Paris Cité, Paris, France.
David F McDermottDana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Brigitte LaguerreCentre Eugene Marquis, Rennes, France.
Hans J HammersUT Southwestern Kidney Cancer Program, Dallas, TX, USA.
Philippe BarthelemyInstitut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe, Strasbourg, France.
Elizabeth R PlimackFox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Delphine BorchielliniCentre Antoine Lacassagne, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.
Marine Gross-GoupilDepartment of Medical Oncology, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France.
Ruiyun JiangBristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, USA.
Chung-Wei LeeBristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, USA.
Heshani de SilvaBristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, USA.
Brian I RiniVanderbilt-Ingram Cancer Center, Nashville, USA.
Bernard EscudierGustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.
Laurence AlbigèsGustave Roussy, Villejuif, France. Electronic address: Laurence.albiges@gustaveroussy.fr.
Institut Gustave Roussy · FRBristol-Myers Squibb (United States) · USCentre Léon Bérard · FRAssistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris · FRBordeaux Population Health · FRBristol-Myers Squibb (Sweden) · SECentre Eugène Marquis · FRDana-Farber/Harvard Cancer Center · USFox Chase Cancer Center · USInstitut de Cancérologie Strasbourg · FRInstitut Paoli-Calmettes · FRInstitut universitaire du cancer de Toulouse Oncopole · FRMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USSouthwestern Medical Center · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversité Côte d'Azur · FRVanderbilt University · US

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Lung Immune Prognostic Index (LIPI) is associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) outcomes across different solid tumors, particularly in non-small cell lung cancer. Data regarding the prognostic and/or predictive role of LIPI in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) are still scarce. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether LIPI could be predictive of survival in mRCC patients.

methodsWe used patient level data from three different prospective studies (NIVOREN trial: nivolumab; TORAVA trial: VEGF/VEGFR-targeted therapy (TT); CheckMate 214: nivolumab-ipilimumab vs sunitinib). LIPI was calculated based on a derived neutrophils/(leukocyte-neutrophil) ratio > 3 and lactate-dehydrogenase >upper limit of normal, classifying patients into three groups (LIPI good, 0 factors;LIPI intermediate (int), 1 factor;LIPI poor, 2 factors) and/or into two groups (LIPI good, 0 factors;LIPI int/poor, 1-2 factors) according to trial sample size. Primary and secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).

resultsIn the Nivolumab dataset (n = 619), LIPI was significantly associated with OS (LIPI-good 30.1 vs 13.8 months in the LIPI int/poor; HR= 0.47) and PFS (HR=0.74). In the VEGF/VEGFR-TT dataset (n = 159), only a correlation with PFS was observed. In the CheckMate214 dataset (n = 1084), LIPI was significantly associated with OS (nivolumab-ipilimumab OS LIPI good vs int/poor: HR=0.55, p < 0.0001; sunitinib: OS LIPI good vs int/poor: 0.38, p < 0.0001) in both treatment groups in univariate and multivariate analysis.

conclusionsPretreatment-LIPI correlated with worse survival outcomes in mRCC treated with either ICI or antiangiogenic therapy, confirming LIPI's prognostic role in mRCC irrespective of systemic treatment used.

Indexed as

Carcinoma, Renal CellKidney NeoplasmsLung NeoplasmsAdultAgedBiomarkers, TumorFemaleHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsMaleMiddle AgedNivolumabPrognosisProgression-Free SurvivalProspective StudiesSunitinibBiomarkers, TumorImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsNivolumabSunitinibAntiangiogenicsBiomarkersimmune checkpoint inhibitorsLIPIPrognosisRenal cell carcinoma

Identifiers

PMID38653033
PMCPMC12085868
OpenAlexW4394566776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.